Stored registration data identifies NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED (IANA 3765) as the registrar. PhishDestroy maintains separate NiceNIC abuse-report research; registrar association is contextual and is not an independent detection for this domain.
The domain quest-katana.network is associated with a generic phishing threat. It has been identified as taking users to potential scams or fraudulent sites. As of now, quest-katana.network has been taken offline and presents no current risk to users directly accessing its previous content.
Quest-katana.network has been flagged by 2 of 95 VirusTotal vendors, including notable security providers such as Fortinet and SOCRadar. It was registered through NiceNIC International Group Co., Limited on March 08, 2026, and resolves to the IP address 172.67.177.167. The domain appears on 3 security blocklists, including PhishDestroy, MetaMask, and SEAL. The SSL certificate for quest-katana.network was issued by Let's Encrypt / E7.
If you have interacted with quest-katana.network, it is advisable to take safety measures by revoking any token approvals if this was a crypto-related phishing attempt, and moving cryptocurrency to a secure wallet. For credential-based phishing, changing passwords should be a priority, along with enabling two-factor authentication and monitoring for any signs of fraud. Users can report incidents to appropriate cybercrime units or phishing report sites.
探测与规避分析
隐身和流量分配检查
未观察到在存储的扫描图像中未观察到遮蔽现象
针对该主机的爬虫与浏览器观察记录，以及针对“Keitaro”式流量分配系统的实时指纹检测。
存储的隐身标志
未观察到
伪装评分
0/6
上次隐形扫描
扫描说明:unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='quest-katana.network', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnection
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Primary outcomeRegistration hold observedreason: Registrar clientHold95% confidence
AttributionNICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITEDmechanism: Registrar clientHoldsource: Rdap Status Collector
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Registrar clientHold
Latest HTTP observation未知Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-14 10:57:36 UTC
RDAP registrationRegistrar clientHoldNICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED · IANA 3765RDAP HTTP 200source: Rdap Status CollectorclientDeleteProhibitedclientHoldclientTransferProhibitedexpires 2027-03-08 01:17:54 UTCchecked 2026-10-14 04:19:57 UTC
Registrar action markerverified clientHold markerNICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED · IANA 3765causal link to our report not established
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-04-12 10:21:09 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-08-05 01:45:38 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-04-12 10:21:09 UTC → 2026-08-05 01:45:38 UTC · 2,751.41hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-06-08 18:03:23 UTC · precision very low · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
技术 · 3 identified
Cloudflare Browser Insights
AnalyticsRUM
Performance monitoring tool that measures website speed from real users.
This timeline displays historical security and status checkpoints observed by the PhishDestroy automated monitoring network. It records domain lifecycle updates, scanner changes, and threat telemetry over time.
12 recorded events. These records describe collected evidence, outgoing notifications and publication; they do not confirm a complete investigation or a takedown.
A stored Cloudflare Radar report is available. The report link alone is not a malicious verdict and does not prove that every network field was captured.
Web Archive
Preserved in 互联网档案馆 — historical evidence archived
We scan suspicious URLs, inspect public results and send evidence through the appropriate abuse-reporting channels. The dated events above show what is recorded for this domain. The directory below explains the wider workflow.
01Public scans & evidence collection10 sources and tool groups+
Inspect the public DNS, TLS, HTTP and technology surface.
02Abuse reports & follow-upRegistrar, hosting and security channels+
Identify the responsible provider. Match registration and hosting records to the relevant abuse contact.
Prepare an evidence package. Include the URL, public scan references, captures and the recorded observations.
Send the report. Keep outgoing report records and recipient information when available.
Recheck and publish updates. Track later scanner verdicts, provider responses and site availability.
Security services used for scanning, reputation checks and reporting are listed below. A service being listed is not evidence that it received, accepted or acted on this particular domain. Recorded submissions appear in the notification history above.
(RU)
PhishDestroy Investigation
