VirusTotal
4 / 92 engine detections
打开报告“KRAKEN САЙТ ЗЕРКАЛО TOR DARKNET ВХОД - Practicando BLW”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is domainabuse@tucows.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 4 days has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
冒充 Kraken: practicandoblw.com — 最后已知的活跃状态 (HTTP 202). 证据摘要: VirusTotal 4/92 (CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, SOCRadar, VIPRE); PhishDestroy score 73/100. 注册商…
为保留原始取证记录,下方的 PhishDestroy AI 详细分析仍使用英文。
4 / 92 engine detections
打开报告Scan report
打开报告4 community references
打开报告provider verdict: clean
打开报告No threat flag
打开报告No malicious flag
打开报告Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
practicandoblw.com hosts an impersonation phishing page built around the Kraken name and aimed at people searching for a Kraken login. PhishDestroy first saw it on 2026-10-16. As of 2026-10-19 the site was alive and the phishing content was still being served.
The page title reads "KRAKEN САЙТ ЗЕРКАЛО TOR DARKNET ВХОД - Practicando BLW", which is Russian for "Kraken site mirror Tor darknet login". That wording points to a darknet-market mirror, while we classify the page as Kraken brand impersonation. Pages like this rank in search results for "mirror" or "login" queries and send visitors to a lookalike sign-in form. Whatever is typed there goes straight to the operators: usernames, passwords and often one-time codes. With those they can take over the account and move its funds before the victim notices.
Independent detection is weak so far. VirusTotal returned 0 detections out of 92 engines when checked on 2026-10-16, and PhishDestroy is currently the only blocklist listing the domain. The domain appears in 4 AlienVault OTX pulses, which shows other researchers have flagged related activity. The classification rests mainly on the Kraken-themed login content served under an unrelated domain name.
The domain was registered on 2019-07-28 through TUCOWS.COM, CO., years before the Kraken-themed content appeared. It resolves to 34.90.62.165 on Google Cloud Platform (Google LLC), with the server located in the Netherlands. The site uses a Let's Encrypt certificate issued by YR2.
Do not enter any credentials on this site, and reach Kraken only by typing its official address yourself or using its official app. If you already signed in here, change your password right away, reset two-factor authentication, end all active sessions and review recent withdrawals and API keys. Contact the impersonated service's support if you see activity you did not authorize. Security teams should block the domain and the IP 34.90.62.165 at DNS and proxy level. Reporting the page to the hosting provider and the registrar helps get it taken down faster, since few vendors detect it yet.
ns1.siteground.netns2.siteground.netmx10.antispam.mailspamprotection.compriority 10mx20.antispam.mailspamprotection.compriority 20mx30.antispam.mailspamprotection.compriority 30Location describes the IP network.
cc5f532be896376abff529e678f63d46d4ae0a5020196b7c5364e5a48aec36b9Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Hostnames retained in the domain record or Certificate Transparency cache. A hostname alone does not establish current availability or malicious activity.
lp.practicandoblw.comDomain recordThe original observation time is not recorded for these hostnames.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of practicandoblw.com · checked Oct 16, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
未知→protected
http_access_restricted · access_restriction
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
protected→live_content
content_served
未知→protected
http_access_restricted · access_restriction
可访问
4/92 engine detections
View sourceNo threat flag
View source4 community references
View sourcePD-20261016-096564
practicandoblw.com
View sourcePage captured
View source已存储 114 个仿冒域名
显示 114 个中的 100 个
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
practicandoblw.com
PD-20261016-096564 Recipient: domainabuse@tucows.com 如果您输入了帐户凭据、个人或付款信息,或者从此域下载了文件,请立即采取措施。以下资源可帮助您报告事件并保护自己。
选择您所在的国家/地区以获取 官方网络犯罪联系人 或 创建投诉草稿 →。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
practicandoblw.com)即使你并不了解所有细节—— 不管怎样都要提交报告. 即使信息不完整,对调查仍有帮助。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.