PhishDestroy identifies phantom-pay.online as a domain engaging in brand impersonation, specifically targeting the Phantom brand, without any indication of a drainer kit being involved.
This domain was flagged due to its technical indicators, including a VirusTotal score of 2/95, a creation date of February 21, 2026, and resolution to the IP address 72.56.101.55, while also being listed on 3 security blocklists, and having an SSL certificate labeled as E8.
The current status of phantom-pay.online is offline, which may be a result of response actions taken to mitigate the threat, however, the risk level remains elevated, prompting the need for continued vigilance and caution when encountering similar domains, as the unique seed 375454 suggests a need for varied and nuanced safety assessments to effectively combat such threats.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年3月24日score 78/1001 brand signal
Observed page title
Payment Platform
Automated brand references
Phantom
TLS 证书
颁发者 E8
Network & certificates
Stored technical evidence
Network & DNS
Resolved IP
72.56.101.55
Network ASN
AS210976
Organization
Timeweb, LLP
Observed location
Amsterdam, NL
Server header
nginx/1.29.4
Location describes the IP network.
TLS 证书
Issuer
E8
Collection source
PhishDestroy collector
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Primary outcomeDNS 非活动reason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation未知Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-19 01:09:23 UTC
RDAP registration未知
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-04-21 20:04:36 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-04-21 20:04:36 UTC → 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTC · 3,884.17hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-07-11 18:09:45 UTC · precision very low · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Check for cloaking
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
No cloaking flag in this check
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='phantom-pay.online', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionEr
phantom-pay.online
Stored observation history10
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
您的加密货币交易所 — notify its fraud team immediately; it may be able to preserve records or restrict funds held on its platform
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
当地警方 — 即使无法立即采取行动，也能留下正式记录
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
加密货币诈骗通常是如何运作的？
虚假网站 — 与正规网站完全一致的克隆网站，仅域名略有改动
恶意批准 — “连接钱包”的提示会使攻击者获得无限的代币消费权限
猪的屠宰 — 通过Telegram/WhatsApp/交友软件花数周时间建立信任，随后钱被骗走
退款诈骗 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
