ABUSE NOTICE · 7D+ OPEN
Outgoing abuse reports are recorded; the latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable.
Notification and current-status evidence
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is complaint@gname.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 11 days has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations.
This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
novachange.pro is an impersonation phishing site that presents itself under the name "NovaChange" to win the trust of cryptocurrency users. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-10-09, just over two weeks after the domain was registered. As of 2026-10-19 the site was still online and serving its phishing content, so it remains a live risk.
How the scam works
The page carries the title "NovaChange" and is built to pass as a legitimate crypto service. Visitors who believe they are on the real platform are steered into actions that hand control to the operators. Those actions can include connecting a wallet and signing requests, sending deposits, or typing in login details and recovery phrases. Its listing by MetaMask and SEAL, two crypto-focused blocklists, points to wallet users as the intended victims. Whatever the route, the loss is the same: funds or account access leave the victim's control, and blockchain transfers cannot be reversed.
Evidence
Six of 92 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain on 2026-10-10: alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Fortinet, Gridinsoft, Kaspersky and VIPRE. That count is modest, but it is typical of a site only days into its run. The stronger signals come from elsewhere. Spamhaus lists the domain in its DBL under the phishing category, MetaMask and SEAL block it alongside PhishDestroy, and four AlienVault OTX threat pulses reference it.
Infrastructure
The domain was registered on 2026-09-24 through GNAME.COM PTE. LTD., and PhishDestroy detected it 15 days later, a short gap that fits a disposable phishing domain. It resolves to 188.114.97.3 on Cloudflare's network (AS13335, US). That address belongs to Cloudflare's proxy rather than the operators' own server. The Let's Encrypt certificate (YE2) is free and issued automatically, so the browser padlock shows only an encrypted connection and says nothing about whether the site is genuine.
What to do
If you connected a wallet to novachange.pro, revoke every token approval it obtained using a reputable approval-checker. Move your remaining assets to a fresh wallet, and treat any seed phrase you typed there as compromised. If you entered a password or 2FA code, change the password wherever you reused it, reset 2FA, and check your account activity. Do not send further "fees" or deposits to recover funds, because recovery offers are a common follow-up scam. Defenders should block the domain at DNS and the proxy, and search logs for users who visited it. Report the site to Cloudflare and the registrar so it can be taken down.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Evidence layersAvailability: Content servingContent: Content served at rootDNS: ResolvedRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation内容在线Ordinary HTTP content served90%2026-10-19 22:41:15 UTC
RDAP registration未知
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-10-19 22:41:15 UTClast content: 2026-10-19 22:41:15 UTC
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
技术 · 4 identified
H
HSTS
安全
HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.
Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
AI辅助草稿——事件详细信息由AI提供商处理 · 自行审核并提交
After a phishing incident
针对受害者的建议与指导
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
我应该立即采取什么措施？
紧急
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
更改所有密码 — 电子邮件、Exchange 账户，以及任何使用同一密码的账户
启用双因素认证 使用身份验证器应用（而非短信）。禁用基于短信的恢复功能
冻结卡片 如果您在钓鱼网站上输入了银行信息
我应该为报告收集哪些信息？
联邦调查局（FBI）指南
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
当地警方 — 即使无法立即采取行动，也能留下正式记录
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
How do phishing scams typically work?
虚假网站 — 与正规网站完全一致的克隆网站，仅域名略有改动
猪的屠宰 — 通过Telegram/WhatsApp/交友软件花数周时间建立信任，随后钱被骗走
退款诈骗 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(SG)
