VirusTotal
13 / 92 engine detections
打开报告“Lrwin: Most Popular Online Crypto Casino Based on Blockchain”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@globaldomaingroup.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 11 days has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
加密赌场诈骗: lrwin.cc — 最后已知的活跃状态 (HTTP 200). 证据摘要: VirusTotal 13/92 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, ESET, Emsisoft, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker); URLScan malicious…
为保留原始取证记录,下方的 PhishDestroy AI 详细分析仍使用英文。
13 / 92 engine detections
打开报告恶意
打开报告恶意
打开报告Scan report
打开报告4 community references
打开报告No threat flag
打开报告Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
lrwin.cc presents itself as "Lrwin: Most Popular Online Crypto Casino Based on Blockchain" and targets people who want to gamble with cryptocurrency. PhishDestroy classifies it as a gambling site operated as a fraud, built on the kit we track as Gambler Scam. We first detected it on 2026-10-09. When we last checked on 2026-10-19, the site was still online and serving its casino content.
Gambler Scam sites copy the look of a real crypto casino. They show games, bonuses and claims of blockchain fairness to make players feel safe before they deposit. Players send crypto to the site and often see their balance grow on screen. When they try to cash out, withdrawals stall, accounts get frozen, or the site demands extra deposits, "verification" payments or fees before releasing funds. Anything deposited should be treated as lost, and the promised winnings were never real money.
On 2026-10-09, 13 of 92 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain. The vendors included alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, ESET, Emsisoft, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, G-Data and Gridinsoft. These are independent engines reaching the same conclusion, so the classification does not rest on one source. urlscan.io returned a malicious verdict and tagged the page as generic crypto and crypto scam content. The domain also appears in four AlienVault OTX threat pulses, which shows other researchers are tracking it.
The domain was registered on 2026-01-22 through Global Domain Group LLC. That is roughly eight and a half months before we detected it, enough time for a site like this to build traffic and take deposits unnoticed. The site sits behind Cloudflare's network in the US, which hides the real origin server from visitors. Its TLS certificate comes from Google Trust Services. The padlock in the browser only means the connection is encrypted and says nothing about whether the casino is honest.
Do not deposit anything further, however the request is worded. Payments to "unlock" a withdrawal, pay taxes or verify an account are part of the scam and will not release your balance. Save your transaction hashes, deposit addresses and any chat logs. Then report the loss to the exchange you sent funds from and to your local fraud authority. If you reused a password on the site, change it wherever else you use it. Security teams should block lrwin.cc at DNS and web proxy level and watch for lookalike casino domains that use the same Gambler Scam layout.
Edge-IP 声誉不属于此域。
randall.ns.cloudflare.comryleigh.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
872f7e9c9c5c59dabd2be0efe50c43153880b90e4a100591b1e2d0e26028daffSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of lrwin.cc · checked Oct 9, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
可访问
No threat flag
View source4 community references
View source13/92 engine detections
View sourcePD-20261009-C50C46
lrwin.cc
View sourcePage captured
View sourceCompare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
lrwin.cc
PD-20261009-C50C46 Recipient: abuse@globaldomaingroup.com 如果您输入了帐户凭据、个人或付款信息,或者从此域下载了文件,请立即采取措施。以下资源可帮助您报告事件并保护自己。
选择您所在的国家/地区以获取 官方网络犯罪联系人 或 创建投诉草稿 →。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
lrwin.cc)即使你并不了解所有细节—— 不管怎样都要提交报告. 即使信息不完整,对调查仍有帮助。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.