VirusTotal
6 / 92 engine detections
打开报告
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@forticore.digital.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 13 days has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
钓鱼: lockcheker.com — 最后已知的活跃状态 (HTTP 200). 证据摘要: VirusTotal 6/92 (alphaMountain.ai, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, Gridinsoft, LevelBlue); Spamhaus…
为保留原始取证记录,下方的 PhishDestroy AI 详细分析仍使用英文。
6 / 92 engine detections
打开报告Suspicious
打开报告DBL_SPAM
Scan report
打开报告4 community references
打开报告No threat flag
打开报告No malicious flag
打开报告Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
lockcheker.com is on the PhishDestroy blocklist as a suspicious domain. It presents only a page titled "Loading" and names no brand. PhishDestroy first saw it on 2026-10-06, ten days after registration. As of 2026-10-19 the site was still online and serving content, so anyone who receives a link to it should treat it as an active risk.
A page that shows nothing but "Loading" gives a visitor no way to judge what it is. The real content may appear only after a script runs, a click, or a wallet prompt. The name reads like a "lock checker" utility, the kind of tool crypto users might be steered to for checking tokens or wallets. We have not tied the site to a specific scheme. The danger with pages like this is that a request to connect a wallet, sign a message or enter account details can appear without warning, and anything approved there can be hard or impossible to reverse.
On 2026-10-10, 6 of 92 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain: alphaMountain.ai, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, Gridinsoft, LevelBlue and SOCRadar. That is a minority of engines, but six vendors reaching the same verdict on a domain this young is a meaningful signal. Spamhaus lists the domain in its DBL as a spam source, which suggests it is being pushed through unsolicited messages. It also appears in four AlienVault OTX threat pulses, so other researchers are tracking it too.
The domain was registered through Gname.com Pte. Ltd. on 2026-09-26 and was flagged within roughly a week and a half. That short gap is typical of throwaway domains set up for a quick campaign. It resolves to an IP located in Finland, on a network registered to M/S Robi Traders, a Bangladeshi operator. The Let's Encrypt certificate only means the padlock icon appears; it says nothing about whether the site is trustworthy.
If you opened the site and it asked you to connect a wallet or sign anything, stop and do not approve the request. If you already connected, review your token approvals with a revocation tool, cancel any you do not recognise, and move funds you care about to a fresh wallet. Never share a seed phrase anywhere, and change any password you typed on the page. Defenders should block the domain at DNS and the mail gateway, check logs for visits since 2026-09-26, and alert users who may have received links to it in spam.
a.dnspod.comb.dnspod.comc.dnspod.comLocation describes the IP network.
6bf0eb5834c0f66d3175e682d6d8140bd25c8232c849cb0f895ff67391c93002Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of lockcheker.com · checked Oct 6, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
No threat flag
View source6/92 engine detections
View sourcePD-20261006-569BF7
4 community references
View sourcePage captured
View sourcelockcheker.com
View sourceCompare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
lockcheker.com
PD-20261006-569BF7 Recipient: abuse@forticore.digital Registrar: Gname.com Pte. Ltd. (Singapore) Policy Violations: Illegal Activities section forbids phishing, fraud, fake sites, malware distribution; registrar investigates and may suspend or delete domain Applicable Laws: Computer Misuse Act 1993 §§3+, Penal Code §§415–420 (cheating), Online Criminal Harms Act (OCHA)
如果您输入了帐户凭据、个人或付款信息,或者从此域下载了文件,请立即采取措施。以下资源可帮助您报告事件并保护自己。
选择您所在的国家/地区以获取 官方网络犯罪联系人 或 创建投诉草稿 →。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
lockcheker.com)即使你并不了解所有细节—— 不管怎样都要提交报告. 即使信息不完整,对调查仍有帮助。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.