VirusTotal
5 / 92
“krakendarknet.site”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@reg.ru.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 13 days has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
krakendarknet.site — 最后已知的活跃状态 (HTTP 200). 品牌冒充:Kraken; 诈骗类型:Impersonation. 证据摘要: VirusTotal 5/92 (alphaMountain.ai, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Gridinsoft, LevelBlue, SOCRadar); PhishDestroy score 88/100. 注册商: Registrar of Domain Na….
为保留原始取证记录,下方的 PhishDestroy AI 详细分析仍使用英文。
krakendarknet.site returned HTTP status 200 on 2026-10-01, according to the recorded HTTP check. The domain was first observed on 2026-09-28, and its registration date is listed as 2025-12-31.
The HTTP check on 2026-10-01 recorded status 200 for krakendarknet.site. The domain was first observed on 2026-09-28, while its registration date is recorded as 2025-12-31. VirusTotal, checked on 2026-09-29, reported 3 detections across 91 scanners. OTX, checked on 2026-10-01, showed 4 pulses. The publisher-owned PhishDestroy catalogue listed the domain, and the PageSpeed check on 2026-09-28 returned a performance score of 67.
The HTTP and OTX checks share the 2026-10-01 date, so those two observations describe the same day, while the VirusTotal check on 2026-09-29 and the PageSpeed check on 2026-09-28 precede them. Because the first observation on 2026-09-28 is earlier than the registration date of 2025-12-31, the recorded timeline spans several months. Comparing these dated sources shows how the recorded picture can shift between checks rather than reflecting a single moment.
Reviewers should retain the dated records for krakendarknet.site, including the HTTP, VirusTotal, OTX and PageSpeed observations, so later checks can be compared against them. Any subsequent HTTP or OTX check should be dated and compared with the earlier entries rather than treated as a replacement. During review, avoid submitting sensitive information to the domain, since the recorded HTTP status alone does not establish what the site currently serves.
针对该主机的爬虫与浏览器观察记录,以及针对“Keitaro”式流量分配系统的实时指纹检测。
openresty扫描说明: alive_content: raw=ok; http=200; via=https_proxy; server=openresty
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
ns1.reg.runs2.reg.ruLocation describes the IP network.
309e705fc996693bfc0643d536d2bba1454dc0f09428afac6e2089b4ebe19c8ewww.krakendarknet.siteSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of krakendarknet.site · checked Sep 28, 2026
95.163.244.138. 16 recorded events. These records describe collected evidence, outgoing notifications and publication; they do not confirm a complete investigation or a takedown.
We scan suspicious URLs, inspect public results and send evidence through the appropriate abuse-reporting channels. The dated events above show what is recorded for this domain. The directory below explains the wider workflow.
Capture the rendered page, requests and visible infrastructure.
Compare the available engine results and retain the analysis timestamp.
Check whether Google currently lists the URL as unsafe.
Inspect a public scan and its recorded network and classification data.
Look for indicator references and related community intelligence.
Compare archived captures and preserve historical context.
Look for matching indicators and associated threat records.
Inspect certificate records and related hostnames.
Compare security resolver responses and record observed blocking.
Inspect the public DNS, TLS, HTTP and technology surface.
Security services used for scanning, reputation checks and reporting are listed below. A service being listed is not evidence that it received, accepted or acted on this particular domain. Recorded submissions appear in the notification history above.
已存储 114 个仿冒域名
显示 114 个中的 100 个
PD-20260928-039BF8 Recipient: abuse@reg.ru Registrar: REG.RU (Russia) Policy Violations: Abuse policy + ICANN contractual obligations; phishing classified as bad-faith use in UDRP; domains may be suspended/removed Applicable Laws: Criminal Code RF Art.159 (fraud), Art.272 (illegal access), Art.273 (malware creation), Art.274.1 (critical infrastructure interference)
如果您输入了帐户凭据、个人或付款信息,或者从此域下载了文件,请立即采取措施。以下资源可帮助您报告事件并保护自己。
选择您所在的国家/地区以获取 官方网络犯罪联系人 或 创建投诉草稿 →。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent