VirusTotal
1 / 92 engine detections
打开报告“徳島県美馬市の住宅型有料老人ホーム 絆|有限会社コスモス”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@regtons.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 40 hours has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
被列入黑名单的域名: kizuna-tokushima.com — 最后已知的活跃状态 (HTTP 200). 证据摘要: VirusTotal 1/92 (SOCRadar); PhishDestroy score 91/100. 注册商: Gransy, s.r.o.
为保留原始取证记录,下方的 PhishDestroy AI 详细分析仍使用英文。
1 / 92 engine detections
打开报告Suspicious
打开报告Scan report
打开报告4 community references
打开报告No threat flag
打开报告No malicious flag
打开报告Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
The domain kizuna-tokushima.com hosts a page titled '徳島県美馬市の住宅型有料老人ホーム 絆|有限会社コスモス', which presents itself as a residential senior‑care home in Tokushima, Japan. It appears to be aimed at Japanese seniors and their relatives seeking assisted‑living services. PhishDestroy first recorded the domain on 2026-10-19. As of that date the site is listed as alive but its content was unreachable.
The page pretends to be an official senior‑care facility, likely to collect personal details such as names, addresses, phone numbers, or payment information from visitors. Attackers may use the gathered data to commit identity theft, apply fraudulent insurance claims, or solicit payments for nonexistent services. No wallet‑draining or cryptocurrency elements are evident, but the impersonation of a trusted care provider creates a social‑engineering vector.
VirusTotal scanned the domain on 2026-10-19 and recorded one positive detection from 92 engines, with SOCRadar flagging it as malicious. PhishDestroy added the domain to its blocklist, and the Open Threat Exchange lists four pulses referencing it. No additional public verdicts from Google Safe Browsing, urlscan.io or Spamhaus were found.
The domain was registered only four days before first sighting, on 2026-10-15, through the registrar Gransy, s.r.o. It resolves to IP 166.117.93.67, indicating hosting on a single server. The short lifespan before detection suggests a fast‑flux or throwaway operation typical of opportunistic fraud campaigns.
Anyone who visited the site and submitted personal or financial information should immediately review bank and credit‑card statements, consider a credit freeze, and notify relevant institutions of possible fraud. Change any passwords that may have been reused and enable two‑factor authentication where possible. Security teams should block kizuna-tokushima.com at DNS and proxy layers, monitor for any related domains registered by the same registrar, and share indicators with threat‑intel communities.
readdy.earth.orderbox-dns.comreaddy.mars.orderbox-dns.comreaddy.mercury.orderbox-dns.comreaddy.venus.orderbox-dns.comLocation describes the IP network.
21e5928183da9dd2b69d6f92df75ad26b79f9f8a1ab08b9ba956f8a8d1322929Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Hostnames retained in the domain record or Certificate Transparency cache. A hostname alone does not establish current availability or malicious activity.
www.kizuna-tokushima.comDomain recordThe original observation time is not recorded for these hostnames.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of kizuna-tokushima.com · checked Oct 19, 2026
Timestamped response metadata retained by the local collection pipeline. Each value below belongs to the displayed archive time.
http://kizuna-tokushima.com/https://kizuna-tokushima.com/Cache-Control: public, max-age=0, must-revalidateContent-Encoding: gzipContent-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8public, max-age=0, must-revalidategzip1289text/html; charset=utf-8Mon, 19 Oct 2026 11:42:27 GMT"d78fc8ce805dcd0594c7bd2e91cc8f92"Accept-EncodingValues retained by the collector; long values may be shortened during collection.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
未知→live_content
content_served
可访问
No threat flag
View source4 community references
View source1/92 engine detections
View sourcePD-20261019-92742A
kizuna-tokushima.com
View sourcePage captured
View sourceCompare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
kizuna-tokushima.com
PD-20261019-92742A Recipient: abuse@regtons.com 如果您输入了帐户凭据、个人或付款信息,或者从此域下载了文件,请立即采取措施。以下资源可帮助您报告事件并保护自己。
选择您所在的国家/地区以获取 官方网络犯罪联系人 或 创建投诉草稿 →。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
kizuna-tokushima.com)即使你并不了解所有细节—— 不管怎样都要提交报告. 即使信息不完整,对调查仍有帮助。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.