VirusTotal
6 / 91 engine detections
打开报告“Ironcladvest”
钓鱼: ironcladvest.com — 最后已知的活跃状态 (HTTP 302). 证据摘要: VirusTotal 6/91 (alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, SOCRadar); Spamhaus DBL_SPAM…
为保留原始取证记录,下方的 PhishDestroy AI 详细分析仍使用英文。
6 / 91 engine detections
打开报告DBL_SPAM
4 community references
打开报告provider verdict: clean
打开报告No threat flag
打开报告Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
ironcladvest.com is on the PhishDestroy blocklist. Its pages carry only the title "Ironcladvest", a name built to sound safe and solid, but no specific impersonated brand has been identified. PhishDestroy first flagged the domain on 2026-09-17. On 2026-10-19 the site was still online and its address redirected visitors elsewhere, so the domain remains active as an entry point.
We have not confirmed a specific scheme behind ironcladvest.com. The title gives no product details, and a name that stresses safety is the kind used to win a visitor's trust before asking for money or personal details. Because the domain redirects, visitors can end up on content that differs from what the name suggests. Treat any request on or after this site for payments, account sign-ups, identity documents or wallet connections as high-risk.
VirusTotal shows 6 of 91 engines flagging the domain as of 2026-09-25: alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, SOCRadar and VIPRE. That is a minority of engines, but these vendors made their calls independently of one another. Spamhaus lists the domain in its DBL as a spam domain, which ties it to unsolicited mailings or similar abuse. It appears in four AlienVault OTX threat pulses, meaning other researchers have reported it too. Among the blocklists we track, only PhishDestroy currently lists it.
The domain was registered on 2026-03-22 through OwnRegistrar, Inc., about six months before PhishDestroy flagged it. A gap like this means the domain was either kept unused for a while or ran unnoticed for months. It is hosted on OVH SAS servers in Germany. The certificate comes from Let's Encrypt, so the browser padlock only shows that the connection is encrypted and says nothing about whether the site is trustworthy.
Do not register, deposit funds or upload documents on ironcladvest.com or any site it redirects to. If you already sent money, contact your bank or payment provider right away and report the transaction. Be suspicious of anyone who later offers to recover your funds for a fee. If you created an account, change that password everywhere you reused it and turn on two-factor authentication. Security teams should block the domain and its redirect targets at DNS and proxy level, and search mail logs for messages that contain it, given the Spamhaus spam listing.
ns3.cloudoon.orgironcladvest.compriority 0Location describes the IP network.
eb9e15680b6cf066cef9f57e190a2db24f8c24dc03b3e08029446b2faa9598f7Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Hostnames retained in the domain record or Certificate Transparency cache. A hostname alone does not establish current availability or malicious activity.
autodiscover.ironcladvest.comDomain recordcpcalendars.ironcladvest.comDomain recordwebmail.ironcladvest.comDomain recordThe original observation time is not recorded for these hostnames.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of ironcladvest.com · checked Sep 25, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
redirect: raw=redirect_302; http=302; via=https_proxy; location=https://ironcladvest.com/cgi-sys/suspendedpage.cgi
ironcladvest.com
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
4→6
可访问
No threat flag
View source4 community references
View source6/91 engine detections
View sourceironcladvest.com
View source2 条社区报告
类别OTHER_INVESTMENT_SCAM
Data submited by Intelligence for good
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
如果您输入了帐户凭据、个人或付款信息,或者从此域下载了文件,请立即采取措施。以下资源可帮助您报告事件并保护自己。
选择您所在的国家/地区以获取 官方网络犯罪联系人 或 创建投诉草稿 →。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
ironcladvest.com)即使你并不了解所有细节—— 不管怎样都要提交报告. 即使信息不完整,对调查仍有帮助。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.