VirusTotal
10 / 92 engine detections
打开报告
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@forticore.digital.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 13 days has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
钓鱼: fortval.cc — 最后已知的活跃状态 (HTTP 200). 证据摘要: VirusTotal 10/92 (alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, ESET, Emsisoft, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker); Spamhaus DBL_SPAM; CF Radar…
为保留原始取证记录,下方的 PhishDestroy AI 详细分析仍使用英文。
10 / 92 engine detections
打开报告恶意
打开报告DBL_SPAM
Scan report
打开报告2 community references
打开报告No threat flag
打开报告No malicious flag
打开报告Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
fortval.cc is on the PhishDestroy blocklist as a suspicious domain. It shows visitors nothing but a page titled "Loading" and does not display a recognizable brand. PhishDestroy first saw it on 2026-10-06. When last checked on 2026-10-19, the site was still online and serving live content.
A page that only says "Loading" does not show what it delivers. A bare page like this can hand off to other content, run scripts in the background or wait for a specific visitor before it shows anything. That page could be a fake wallet-connect prompt, a login form or a download. We have not tied fortval.cc to a specific scheme. However, the vendor flags and the spam listing below point to a site built for abuse, not an ordinary project, so any request it makes for a wallet connection, a seed phrase, a signature or credentials should be treated as hostile.
On 2026-10-07, 10 of 92 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain. The vendors include alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, ESET, Emsisoft, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, Kaspersky and LevelBlue. Agreement among several independent vendors counts for more than a single outlier. Spamhaus lists the domain in its DBL under the spam category, and it appears in 2 AlienVault OTX threat pulses, so other researchers have tracked it as well.
The domain was registered on 2026-09-18 through Gname.com Pte. Ltd. It was flagged only 18 days later, a short lifespan typical of disposable scam domains. It resolves to 46.29.26.38, which sits on a network registered to M/S Robi Traders of Bangladesh, with the server located in Finland. The domain owner, the network operator and the server location span three different countries, which makes it harder to trace who runs the site.
Do not return to fortval.cc or follow any prompts it shows. If you connected a crypto wallet or signed anything there, revoke the token approvals granted during that session and move funds to a fresh wallet if you shared a seed phrase. If you entered a password, change it wherever you reuse it and turn on two-factor authentication. Security teams should block the domain and its IP at DNS and proxy level, and check their logs for any connections to it since 2026-09-18.
a.dnspod.comb.dnspod.comc.dnspod.comLocation describes the IP network.
578315cb1f1a580c680264900980dad5ee0b9b6b65b3348d2ddafe261544b136Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of fortval.cc · checked Oct 6, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
No threat flag
View source10/92 engine detections
View sourcePD-20261006-A7486D
2 community references
View sourcePage captured
View sourcefortval.cc
View sourceCompare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
fortval.cc
PD-20261006-A7486D Recipient: abuse@forticore.digital Registrar: Gname.com Pte. Ltd. (Singapore) Policy Violations: Illegal Activities section forbids phishing, fraud, fake sites, malware distribution; registrar investigates and may suspend or delete domain Applicable Laws: Computer Misuse Act 1993 §§3+, Penal Code §§415–420 (cheating), Online Criminal Harms Act (OCHA)
如果您输入了帐户凭据、个人或付款信息,或者从此域下载了文件,请立即采取措施。以下资源可帮助您报告事件并保护自己。
选择您所在的国家/地区以获取 官方网络犯罪联系人 或 创建投诉草稿 →。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
fortval.cc)即使你并不了解所有细节—— 不管怎样都要提交报告. 即使信息不完整,对调查仍有帮助。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.