VirusTotal
7 / 92 engine detections
打开报告
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@forticore.digital.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 13 days has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
钓鱼: fortsls.com — 未验证. 证据摘要: VirusTotal 7/92 (alphaMountain.ai, Bfore.Ai PreCrime, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet); URLQuery 2 det.; Spamhaus…
为保留原始取证记录,下方的 PhishDestroy AI 详细分析仍使用英文。
7 / 92 engine detections
打开报告2 det.
打开报告Suspicious
打开报告DBL_SPAM
4 community references
打开报告No threat flag
打开报告No malicious flag
打开报告Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
fortsls.com is a suspicious domain on the PhishDestroy blocklist. It shows a bare page titled "Loading" and names no brand, so the target is not visible from the page itself. PhishDestroy first saw it on 2026-10-07. As of 2026-10-19 the host was still responding, but DNS for its content had gone inactive.
A page that only says "Loading" gives a visitor nothing to judge. Pages like this often act as a holding or redirect step, with the real content served later or only to some visitors. The detections point to phishing or spam-linked activity. On crypto-focused sites that usually means a fake login, a request for a seed phrase, or a prompt to connect a wallet and sign transactions that hand over funds. No specific brand, kit or scheme has been confirmed for this domain.
On 2026-10-11, seven of 92 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain: alphaMountain.ai, Bfore.Ai PreCrime, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, Gridinsoft and VIPRE. That is a minority of engines, but the vendors are independent of one another, and Bfore.Ai's predictive engine flags domains before they become widely abused. Spamhaus lists the domain in its DBL as spam, and it appears in four AlienVault OTX threat pulses. Among the blocklists tracked here, only PhishDestroy lists it.
The domain was registered on 2026-09-08 through Gname.com Pte. Ltd., 29 days before PhishDestroy flagged it. A domain that draws detections within weeks of registration fits the disposable pattern common to short-lived fraud sites. It resolves to 46.29.26.38. That address sits in a network registered to M/S Robi Traders of Bangladesh and is geolocated in Finland, so the operator and the server are in different countries. The free Let's Encrypt certificate gives the site a padlock, but a padlock says nothing about whether a site is trustworthy.
If you entered a password or email on this site, change it wherever you reuse it and turn on two-factor authentication. If you typed in a seed phrase or private key, treat that wallet as compromised and move your funds to a new wallet right away. If you connected a wallet or signed a transaction, review and revoke any token approvals you do not recognize. Security teams should block the domain and its IP address, and search proxy and DNS logs for visits since 2026-09-08.
a.dnspod.comb.dnspod.comc.dnspod.comLocation describes the IP network.
5d881949be4793327a5ce4dd2e0c5616a6ae545e67f070132b155d47f02a2c9bSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of fortsls.com · checked Oct 7, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
live_content→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
可访问
No threat flag
View source7/92 engine detections
View sourcePD-20261007-61AE83
4 community references
View sourcefortsls.com
View sourcePage captured
View sourceCompare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
fortsls.com
PD-20261007-61AE83 Recipient: abuse@forticore.digital Registrar: Gname.com Pte. Ltd. (Singapore) Policy Violations: Illegal Activities section forbids phishing, fraud, fake sites, malware distribution; registrar investigates and may suspend or delete domain Applicable Laws: Computer Misuse Act 1993 §§3+, Penal Code §§415–420 (cheating), Online Criminal Harms Act (OCHA)
如果您输入了帐户凭据、个人或付款信息,或者从此域下载了文件,请立即采取措施。以下资源可帮助您报告事件并保护自己。
选择您所在的国家/地区以获取 官方网络犯罪联系人 或 创建投诉草稿 →。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
fortsls.com)即使你并不了解所有细节—— 不管怎样都要提交报告. 即使信息不完整,对调查仍有帮助。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.