VirusTotal
9 / 92 engine detections
打开报告
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@forticore.digital.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 13 days has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
钓鱼: fortomax.com — 最后已知的活跃状态 (HTTP 200). 证据摘要: VirusTotal 9/92 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, G-Data); Spamhaus DBL_SPAM…
为保留原始取证记录,下方的 PhishDestroy AI 详细分析仍使用英文。
9 / 92 engine detections
打开报告DBL_SPAM
Scan report
打开报告4 community references
打开报告provider verdict: clean
打开报告No threat flag
打开报告No malicious flag
打开报告Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
fortomax.com is a domain on the PhishDestroy blocklist. It shows nothing but a page titled "Loading", with no visible brand or service to explain what it offers. PhishDestroy first saw it on 2026-10-06. As of 2026-10-19 the site was still online and serving content, so anyone who lands on it is still exposed.
The "Loading" title shows no product, company or wallet, so the page's purpose cannot be read from its surface. A bare holding page is often a waypoint: visitors arrive through ads, messages or links and are then shown a login form, a wallet prompt or a redirect to another site. The risk is that anything typed or approved after that screen, such as credentials, personal details or a wallet signature, goes to whoever runs the domain. Until the page shows what it really does, treat any request for data or a wallet connection there as hostile.
Nine of 92 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain as of 2026-10-11. They include BitDefender, Kaspersky, Fortinet, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, G-Data, Gridinsoft, alphaMountain.ai and LevelBlue. That is a minority of engines, but the flaggers are established vendors working independently. Spamhaus lists the domain in its DBL as a spam source, which links it to unsolicited distribution. It also appears in four AlienVault OTX threat pulses, meaning other researchers have tied it to tracked malicious activity.
The domain was registered on 2026-04-16 through Global Domain Group LLC, about six months before PhishDestroy detected it. A domain held that long before surfacing may have been aged on purpose to look less suspicious to filters. It resolves to 46.29.26.38, an address geolocated in Finland on a network registered to M/S Robi Traders of Bangladesh. That mismatch between the hosting location and the network owner is worth noting for anyone tracing the operation.
Do not enter credentials, personal information or wallet details on fortomax.com, and close the page if it asks for any of them. If you already typed a password there, change it everywhere you reuse it and turn on two-factor authentication. If you connected a wallet or signed anything on the site, stop using that wallet and move any remaining funds to a fresh one. Security teams should block the domain and its IP at DNS and proxy level and search mail and web logs for earlier visits. Report any new links pointing to it so they can be taken down.
a.dnspod.comb.dnspod.comc.dnspod.comLocation describes the IP network.
1518543f3e7ab71f29f22bbbe3e0e4a19cbb7b85555fe7a974ba4d8660e0ee7bSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Hostnames retained in the domain record or Certificate Transparency cache. A hostname alone does not establish current availability or malicious activity.
www.fortomax.comDomain recordThe original observation time is not recorded for these hostnames.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of fortomax.com · checked Oct 6, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
3→4
6→3
未知→live_content
content_served
可访问
No threat flag
View source9/92 engine detections
View source4 community references
View sourcePD-20261006-36211F
fortomax.com
View sourcePage captured
View sourceCompare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
fortomax.com
PD-20261006-36211F Recipient: abuse@forticore.digital 如果您输入了帐户凭据、个人或付款信息,或者从此域下载了文件,请立即采取措施。以下资源可帮助您报告事件并保护自己。
选择您所在的国家/地区以获取 官方网络犯罪联系人 或 创建投诉草稿 →。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
fortomax.com)即使你并不了解所有细节—— 不管怎样都要提交报告. 即使信息不完整,对调查仍有帮助。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.