VirusTotal
7 / 92 engine detections
打开报告
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@forticore.digital.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 13 days has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
钓鱼: fortfind.com — 最后已知的活跃状态 (HTTP 200). 证据摘要: VirusTotal 7/92 (alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, Gridinsoft); Spamhaus DBL_SPAM…
为保留原始取证记录,下方的 PhishDestroy AI 详细分析仍使用英文。
7 / 92 engine detections
打开报告DBL_SPAM
Scan report
打开报告no community references
打开报告provider verdict: clean
打开报告No threat flag
打开报告No malicious flag
打开报告Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
fortfind.com is on the PhishDestroy blocklist as a suspicious domain. It does not openly imitate any brand. The page shows only the title "Loading". PhishDestroy first saw it on 2026-10-06, and the site was still online with live content on 2026-10-19.
A page that only says "Loading" gives a visitor nothing to judge it by. The real content may appear after a script runs, after a redirect, or only for some visitors. That makes it a poor place to connect a wallet, approve a transaction or type credentials, because you cannot confirm who runs the page or what it will ask for. PhishDestroy has not tied the domain to a specific scheme. The risk the evidence points to is handing data, signatures or funds to an operator who stays hidden behind a blank front page.
Seven of 92 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain as of 2026-10-11: alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, Gridinsoft, LevelBlue and SOCRadar. That count is modest. Still, these vendors use separate methods, and their agreement suggests the warning is not one tool's false alarm. Spamhaus lists the domain in its DBL as a spam domain, which is a separate reputation signal from a different source. Among the blocklists checked, PhishDestroy is the only one carrying it so far.
The domain was registered on 2026-03-30 through Global Domain Group LLC, about six months before PhishDestroy flagged it. That gap means it was either held in reserve or ran unnoticed for a while. It resolves to an address on AS132359 (M/S ROBI TRADERS), located in Finland. The site uses an automatically issued certificate, as most sites now do, so the padlock says nothing about who operates it.
If you opened fortfind.com and entered nothing, close it and do not return. If you typed a password there, change it wherever you reuse it and turn on two-factor authentication. If you entered a seed phrase or private key, treat that wallet as compromised and move any remaining funds to a newly created wallet. If you signed or approved anything from a wallet, review that wallet's activity and existing permissions with a trusted tool. Security teams should block the domain at DNS and proxy level, check logs for earlier visits, and watch for new content appearing behind the "Loading" page.
a.dnspod.comb.dnspod.comc.dnspod.comLocation describes the IP network.
03e32af54f648e18ac320bffb0302fb07f24e92ed3f27a99303b7f6a94a6667eSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Hostnames retained in the domain record or Certificate Transparency cache. A hostname alone does not establish current availability or malicious activity.
www.fortfind.comDomain recordThe original observation time is not recorded for these hostnames.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of fortfind.com · checked Oct 6, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
No threat flag
View source7/92 engine detections
View sourcePD-20261006-1D94B2
Page captured
View sourcefortfind.com
View sourceCompare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
fortfind.com
PD-20261006-1D94B2 Recipient: abuse@forticore.digital 如果您输入了帐户凭据、个人或付款信息,或者从此域下载了文件,请立即采取措施。以下资源可帮助您报告事件并保护自己。
选择您所在的国家/地区以获取 官方网络犯罪联系人 或 创建投诉草稿 →。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
fortfind.com)即使你并不了解所有细节—— 不管怎样都要提交报告. 即使信息不完整,对调查仍有帮助。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.