ABUSE NOTICE · 7D+ OPEN
Outgoing abuse reports are recorded; the latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable.
Notification and current-status evidence
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@dreamscapenetworks.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 1 month has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations.
This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
essential-being.com is classified by PhishDestroy as an impersonation phishing page, a site built to pass itself off as a service people already trust. PhishDestroy first detected it on 2026-09-11. As of 2026-10-19 the domain was still online and answering requests. When visited, it returned a page titled "Not Acceptable!", which reads as a server error rather than a branded login screen, while our classification is impersonation phishing.
How the scam works
Impersonation pages copy the look, wording and flow of a familiar brand so visitors believe they are on the real site. Victims typically arrive through a link in an email, a direct message, a search ad or a social post. They are then asked to sign in, verify an account, or enter recovery details or a crypto wallet seed phrase. Whatever is typed goes straight to the operators. They use it to take over accounts, move funds, or resell the access.
Evidence
On 2026-09-18, VirusTotal showed 14 of 89 security engines flagging the domain. That is a minority, but it comes from established vendors including BitDefender, ESET, Fortinet, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, G-Data, Gridinsoft, alphaMountain.ai and CyRadar. The domain also appears in 5 AlienVault OTX threat pulses, so other researchers have tied it to malicious activity independently. Among the blocklists we track, only PhishDestroy currently lists it, which means many browsers and filters may still let it through.
Infrastructure
The domain was registered on 2018-01-09 through Dreamscape Networks International Pte Ltd, more than eight years before PhishDestroy flagged it. That long history is unusual compared with the freshly registered throwaway domains common in phishing. The site is hosted on Dreamscape Networks' own network in Australia. Its Sectigo domain-validated certificate only shows that someone controls the domain, so the padlock in the browser says nothing about whether the site is legitimate.
What to do
If you entered a password on this site, change it immediately on the real service and on any account where you reused it. Turn on app-based or hardware two-factor authentication and sign out of all other sessions. If you typed a wallet seed phrase or private key, treat that wallet as compromised and move any remaining funds to a newly created wallet at once. Security teams should block the domain at the DNS and proxy level and search mail and web logs for users who visited it. Reports to the registrar and hosting provider help speed up takedown.
颁发者 Sectigo Limited / Sectigo Public Server Authentication CA DV R36· stored validity ends in 89 days
Network & certificates
Stored technical evidence
Network & DNS
Resolved IP
103.20.200.161
Network ASN
AS38719
Organization
Dreamscape Networks Limited
Observed location
Sydney, AU
Server header
Apache
域名服务器 2
ns1.syrahost.com
ns2.syrahost.com
Mail routing 1 MX record
mail.essential-being.compriority 0
Location describes the IP network.
TLS 证书
Issuer
Sectigo Limited / Sectigo Public Server Authentication CA DV R36
Valid from
2026-01-10 00:00:00
Valid until
2027-01-17 23:59:59
Hostname coverage
Certificate hostname mismatch
Validity
Within stored validity dates
Collection time
2026-10-09 13:03:27 UTC
Collection source
PhishDestroy collector
Certificate fingerprint0258daa2d15191e77d9287501bb236e2a282a69e0aee3f0eb99a84c91fc1260dCertificate names · 1 SANs
www.essential-being.com
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
AI辅助草稿——事件详细信息由AI提供商处理 · 自行审核并提交
After a phishing incident
针对受害者的建议与指导
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
我应该立即采取什么措施？
紧急
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
更改所有密码 — 电子邮件、Exchange 账户，以及任何使用同一密码的账户
启用双因素认证 使用身份验证器应用（而非短信）。禁用基于短信的恢复功能
冻结卡片 如果您在钓鱼网站上输入了银行信息
我应该为报告收集哪些信息？
联邦调查局（FBI）指南
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
当地警方 — 即使无法立即采取行动，也能留下正式记录
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
How do phishing scams typically work?
虚假网站 — 与正规网站完全一致的克隆网站，仅域名略有改动
猪的屠宰 — 通过Telegram/WhatsApp/交友软件花数周时间建立信任，随后钱被骗走
退款诈骗 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(AU)
