VirusTotal
8 / 95
“Digifinex Login | Secure Access to Your Crypto Account”
duplicate-disabled-389.invalid — 未验证. 品牌冒充:Argent; 诈骗类型:Credential Phishing. 证据摘要: VirusTotal 8/95 (BitDefender, CyRadar, Fortinet, G-Data, Kaspersky); PhishDestroy score 74/100. 注册商: NiceNIC.
为保留原始取证记录,下方的 PhishDestroy AI 详细分析仍使用英文。
The domain www.digifinex-login.com was created on August 24, 2024 and is currently taken offline. Registration records show it was registered through NiceNIC International Group Co., Limited, and the authoritative nameservers are pns51.cloudns.net and pns52.cloudns.net. The site served a page titled "Digifinex Login | Secure Access to Your Crypto Account," indicating a credential phishing attempt targeting users of the crypto exchange Digifinex and impersonating the brand argent. No SSL certificate was observed, meaning the site operated over plain HTTP.
DNS resolution points to IP address 185.149.120.107, which belongs to the Russian AS57724 network operated by DDOS-GUARD LTD. The IP and domain have been listed on at least one public blocklist and are explicitly blocked by PhishDestroy. VirusTotal analysis shows that eight of ninety‑five security vendors flagged the domain, providing independent confirmation of malicious intent. Additionally, AlienVault OTX includes the domain in a single threat‑intelligence pulse, further corroborating its association with phishing activity.
While the site is no longer reachable, the infrastructure—particularly the hosting IP and nameserver configuration—remains reusable for future campaigns. Defenders should ensure that the IP 185.149.120.107 is denied at network perimeters, add the domain to internal URL filtering and sink‑hole lists, and monitor the associated nameservers for any new domains that resolve to the same address. Continuous threat‑intel correlation with the eight VirusTotal detections and the OTX pulse will help surface re‑use of this infrastructure in emerging campaigns.
针对该主机的爬虫与浏览器观察记录,以及针对“Keitaro”式流量分配系统的实时指纹检测。
扫描说明: unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='duplicate-disabled-389.invalid', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by New
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
pns51.cloudns.netpns52.cloudns.netLocation describes the IP network.
10 recorded events. These records describe collected evidence, outgoing notifications and publication; they do not confirm a complete investigation or a takedown.
We scan suspicious URLs, inspect public results and send evidence through the appropriate abuse-reporting channels. The dated events above show what is recorded for this domain. The directory below explains the wider workflow.
Capture the rendered page, requests and visible infrastructure.
Compare the available engine results and retain the analysis timestamp.
Check whether Google currently lists the URL as unsafe.
Inspect a public scan and its recorded network and classification data.
Look for indicator references and related community intelligence.
Compare archived captures and preserve historical context.
Look for matching indicators and associated threat records.
Inspect certificate records and related hostnames.
Compare security resolver responses and record observed blocking.
Inspect the public DNS, TLS, HTTP and technology surface.
Security services used for scanning, reputation checks and reporting are listed below. A service being listed is not evidence that it received, accepted or acted on this particular domain. Recorded submissions appear in the notification history above.
如果您输入了帐户凭据、个人或付款信息,或者从此域下载了文件,请立即采取措施。以下资源可帮助您报告事件并保护自己。
选择您所在的国家/地区以获取 官方网络犯罪联系人 或 创建投诉草稿 →。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent