ABUSE NOTICE · 7D+ OPEN
Outgoing abuse reports are recorded; the latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable.
Notification and current-status evidence
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is domainabuse@tucows.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 25 days has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations.
This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
dptokr.com is a phishing page that impersonates Amazon under the title "Amazon Refund Check," aimed at Amazon shoppers who are told money is waiting for them. PhishDestroy first saw it on 2026-09-25. As of 2026-10-19 the site was still reported alive, but its DNS had gone inactive and it was no longer serving the phishing content.
How the scam works
Refund lures like this one usually arrive by email, SMS or a sponsored link claiming an order was cancelled or overcharged and that a refund is pending. The "Amazon Refund Check" page then asks the victim to sign in and confirm their identity or payment card so the money can be returned. Whatever is typed in goes to the operators, who can take over the Amazon account, reuse the password elsewhere, or charge the card. Some versions also ask for a one-time code, which lets the attacker get past two-factor protection in real time.
Evidence
On 2026-10-07, 17 of 92 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain, including BitDefender, Fortinet, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, G-Data, Gridinsoft, alphaMountain.ai, CRDF and CyRadar. That is a meaningful spread of independent vendors for a page only weeks old. urlscan.io returned a malicious verdict and identified Amazon branding on the page, which matches our classification. PhishDestroy lists the domain on its blocklist.
Infrastructure
The domain was registered through TUCOWS.COM, CO. on 2026-09-21, and PhishDestroy caught it four days later. That short gap fits a throwaway domain set up for a single campaign. It was hosted on AVA HOST SRL in Moldova, an unusual location for anything genuinely tied to Amazon. Its TLS certificate from TrustAsia's LiteSSL RSA CA 2025 shows the browser padlock, which only confirms an encrypted connection and says nothing about the site being legitimate.
What to do
If you entered your Amazon password here, change it right away, along with any other account that shares it, and turn on or reset two-factor authentication. Check your Amazon account for unfamiliar orders, addresses or linked devices. If you entered card details, contact your bank to block the card and dispute any unknown charges. Real Amazon refunds go back to your original payment method automatically and never need you to sign in through an outside page. Defenders should block the domain and its hosting IP, search mail and proxy logs for visits, and report the lure messages to Amazon.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Primary outcomeDNS 非活动reason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation未知Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-20 10:07:04 UTC
RDAP registration未知
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-10-02 10:11:30 UTClast content: 2026-10-02 10:11:30 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-10-03 16:16:30 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-10-02 10:11:30 UTC → 2026-10-03 16:16:30 UTC · 30.08hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-10-03 01:14:00 UTC · precision medium · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
技术 · 5 identified
V
Vue.js
JavaScript frameworks
Vue.js is an open-source model–view–viewmodel JavaScript framework for building user interfaces and single-page applications.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
AI辅助草稿——事件详细信息由AI提供商处理 · 自行审核并提交
After a phishing incident
针对受害者的建议与指导
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
我应该立即采取什么措施？
紧急
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
更改所有密码 — 电子邮件、Exchange 账户，以及任何使用同一密码的账户
启用双因素认证 使用身份验证器应用（而非短信）。禁用基于短信的恢复功能
冻结卡片 如果您在钓鱼网站上输入了银行信息
我应该为报告收集哪些信息？
联邦调查局（FBI）指南
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
当地警方 — 即使无法立即采取行动，也能留下正式记录
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
How do phishing scams typically work?
虚假网站 — 与正规网站完全一致的克隆网站，仅域名略有改动
猪的屠宰 — 通过Telegram/WhatsApp/交友软件花数周时间建立信任，随后钱被骗走
退款诈骗 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
