VirusTotal
18 / 93 engine detections
打开报告“Raydium”
冒充 Celer: decentralizedraydiummarket.online — 内容不可用. 证据摘要: VirusTotal 18/93 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, Certego, Cluster25, CRDF); PhishDestroy score…
为保留原始取证记录,下方的 PhishDestroy AI 详细分析仍使用英文。
18 / 93 engine detections
打开报告checked — no match recorded
1 community reference
打开报告64/100
打开报告No threat flag
打开报告No malicious flag
打开报告Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
The site decentralizedraydiummarket.online presented itself as "Raydium," a decentralized exchange interface, but was flagged as a cryptocurrency scam. Its primary threat was impersonating the legitimate brand "celer" to deceive users into connecting wallets or authorizing malicious transactions.
Technical evidence includes 18 out of 95 VirusTotal detections, with flags from alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, Certego, Cluster25, and CRDF. The domain was created on 2026-02-21, hosted at IP 172.67.142.219 (US, AS13335 Cloudflare, Inc.), and used an SSL certificate (WE1). It appeared on 3 blocklists, with a DOM risk score of 85, GridinSoft trust at 0/100, and ScamAdviser trust at 64/100.
The site is currently down/offline, indicating it is no longer accessible. Based on the high DOM risk score and low trust ratings, the risk level was significant while active, but the current offline status reduces immediate operational threat.
Edge-IP 声誉不属于此域。
Location describes the IP network.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='decentralizedraydiummarket.online', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by
decentralizedraydiummarket.online
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
18/93 engine detections
View sourceNo threat flag
View source1 community references
View sourcedecentralizedraydiummarket.online
View sourceListed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
如果您输入了帐户凭据、个人或付款信息,或者从此域下载了文件,请立即采取措施。以下资源可帮助您报告事件并保护自己。
选择您所在的国家/地区以获取 官方网络犯罪联系人 或 创建投诉草稿 →。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
decentralizedraydiummarket.online)即使你并不了解所有细节—— 不管怎样都要提交报告. 即使信息不完整,对调查仍有帮助。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.