VirusTotal
6 / 89
Interpretation & limits
Engine detections from this stored analysis. Vendors and collection times may differ from other sources.
“$100M Offers by Alex Hormozi | Acquisition”
Assessment based on the stored source evidence below. Review sources →
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@rashost.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 1 month has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
acqmark.shop — Doğrulanmamış. Marka kimliğine bürünme: Fakeshop; Dolandırıcılık türü: Impersonation. Kanıt özeti: VirusTotal 6/89 (alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, ESET, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Gridinsoft); URLQuery 1 alert; URLScan malicious verdict; PhishDestroy score 90/100. Kayıt kuruluşu: Dynadot.
Özgün adli kaydı korumak için aşağıdaki ayrıntılı PhishDestroy AI analizi İngilizce bırakılmıştır.
These are dated observations, not a live safety check. No flag, a stored capture, or a completed analysis does not establish that a site is safe.
6 / 89
Engine detections from this stored analysis. Vendors and collection times may differ from other sources.
1 threat-system alert
BildirAlerts refer to the preserved scan. They do not describe the current state of the site.
malicious
BildirThis is the recorded automated analysis. Completion alone is not a safety verdict.
4 community references
BildirCommunity publication references, not a vendor verdict or evidence of a common operator.
provider verdict: clean
A result applies to the recorded source and observation time. Absence of a flag is not proof of safety.
saklanan rapor
Bildir A preserved page image documents what the collector received; a capture is not a safety verdict.
Checked; no threat flag recorded
BildirA result applies to the recorded source and observation time. Absence of a flag is not proof of safety.
| Detection System | Indicator | Verdict | Alert |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS4EU | acqmark.shop |
malicious | Sinkholed |
Stored narrative · generated . Provider checks below retain their own observation dates.
acqmark.shop returned HTTP status 200 in an HTTP check dated 2026-10-01, a recorded response that describes that single request rather than the domain's full content. The same domain appears in the PhishDestroy internal listing, and its earliest observation in this evidence set is dated 2026-09-09.
The HTTP check dated 2026-10-01 recorded status 200 for acqmark.shop. VirusTotal, checked 2026-09-20, reported 6 detections across 89 scanners. OTX, checked 2026-09-10, recorded 4 pulses. The PhishDestroy internal listing was recorded as true, and the first observation of the domain is dated 2026-09-09. A PageSpeed check dated 2026-09-09 recorded a performance score of 66, while the SSL scan dated 2026-09-10 named Let's Encrypt / YE2 as the issuer.
The dated records describe separate measurements taken by different sources, so the HTTP status, scanner detections, OTX pulses and listing flag each cover only what that source recorded at its own check. The chronology shows the first observation and PageSpeed check on 2026-09-09, followed by the SSL and OTX checks on 2026-09-10, with the VirusTotal check later on 2026-09-20 and the HTTP check on 2026-10-01. Because the dates differ, these records should be read as a sequence of observations rather than as a single combined measurement.
Preserve the HTTP check record for acqmark.shop and the VirusTotal result as separate source documents. Preserve the OTX record and the PhishDestroy internal listing entry in their own files. Compare the HTTP status record against the PhishDestroy listing entry in one review, and compare the VirusTotal detections against the OTX pulses in another. Keep each source's recorded date attached to its own record so later reviews can distinguish the observations.
Bu ana bilgisayar için saklanmış tarayıcı-karşı-tarayıcı gözlemleri ile Keitaro tarzı trafik dağıtım sistemleri için gerçek zamanlı parmak izi kontrolü.
Tarayıcı notu: timeout: raw=timeout; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='acqmark.shop', port=80): Read timed out. (read timeout=7)
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
cullen.ns.cloudflare.comerin.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
ab7b50e59af3f9984c3bc431bd5946731c16a480d57417bd7e3cb86ee659dd9fSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of acqmark.shop · checked Sep 9, 2026
37.72.142.130.16 recorded events. These records describe collected evidence, outgoing notifications and publication; they do not confirm a complete investigation or a takedown.
We scan suspicious URLs, inspect public results and send evidence through the appropriate abuse-reporting channels. The dated events above show what is recorded for this domain. The directory below explains the wider workflow.
Capture the rendered page, requests and visible infrastructure.
Compare the available engine results and retain the analysis timestamp.
Check whether Google currently lists the URL as unsafe.
Inspect a public scan and its recorded network and classification data.
Look for indicator references and related community intelligence.
Compare archived captures and preserve historical context.
Look for matching indicators and associated threat records.
Inspect certificate records and related hostnames.
Compare security resolver responses and record observed blocking.
Inspect the public DNS, TLS, HTTP and technology surface.
Security services used for scanning, reputation checks and reporting are listed below. A service being listed is not evidence that it received, accepted or acted on this particular domain. Recorded submissions appear in the notification history above.
PD-20260909-3A9ED5 Recipient: abuse@rashost.com Policy Violations: Illegal Activities: Active phishing operation targeting victims Fraud & Deception: Impersonation of legitimate services Identity Theft: Collection of credentials under false pretenses Applicable Laws (Unknown): International Anti-Cybercrime Regulations Budapest Convention on Cybercrime Universal Fraud Prevention Laws Phishing activities violate international cybercrime conventions and Unknown's domestic fraud laws. Action Required: This evidence-backed report demonstrates clear violations requiring suspension per your policies. Continued hosting exposes your organization to regulatory scrutiny and potential legal liability.
Hesap kimlik bilgilerini, kişisel bilgileri veya ödeme bilgilerini girdiyseniz ya da bu alan adından bir dosya indirdiyseniz hemen harekete geçin. Aşağıda olayı bildirmenize ve kendinizi korumanıza yardımcı olacak kaynaklar bulunmaktadır.
resmi siber suç iletişim bilgileri veya şikayet taslağı oluştur → almak için ülkenizi seçin.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Saklanan engelleme listesi, WHOIS, DNS ve genel tarama kanıtlarını kullanarak tehdit analizi
Şimdi TaraŞüpheli alan adlarını tehdit veritabanımıza bildirin — topluluğu koruyun
BildirSon kimlik avı raporları ve gözlemlenen kullanılabilirlik değişiklikleri
İzleCanlı tehditleri izleyin veya bunun yanlış bir uyarı olduğunu düşünüyorsanız bu kayda itiraz edin