onchainir.com was first observed on 2026-10-11, with a MetaMask blocklist entry recorded on the same date. The domain is also referenced by SEAL and internally listed by PhishDestroy, providing several distinct indicators for review.
Recorded Evidence
MetaMask and SEAL both included onchainir.com in their external blocklists as of 2026-10-11. PhishDestroy internally listed the domain for monitoring or further action on the same date. The domain was registered through Gransy, s.r.o. on 2026-09-11, establishing its timeline in public records.
Interpretation
PhishDestroy's internal listing contains a record of onchainir.com being tracked within their system, which is a measurement of its status for review. The external blocklist entries from MetaMask and SEAL document that the domain was referenced by these sources on the same date, offering multiple perspectives on its recorded profile. The combination of these records allows for comparison across different security intelligence sources without asserting any further context.
Recommended Actions
Retain the MetaMask and SEAL blocklist records for onchainir.com as reference for future assessments. Preserve the PhishDestroy internal listing for comparison with other security intelligence sources. Continue to check for new or updated listings to ensure all recorded evidence remains current.
탐지 회피 분석
클로킹 및 트래픽 분산 점검
아직 스캔되지 않았습니다크롤러와 브라우저 간의 차이는 아직 보고된 바가 없습니다.
이 호스트에 대해 저장된 크롤러 대 브라우저 관측 데이터와, 케이타로 스타일의 트래픽 분배 시스템을 위한 실시간 지문 확인 정보.
저장된 은신 플래그
아직 스캔되지 않았습니다
TDS 지문 인식 실시간 확인
이 패널이 열려 있을 때 PhishDestroy 스캐너에서 실행되는 7개의 케이타로 지문과 크롤러 대 브라우저 비교 결과.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Latest HTTP observation알 수 없음Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-11 11:34:20 UTC
RDAP registration알 수 없음
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-10-11 11:34:20 UTC
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
This timeline displays historical security and status checkpoints observed by the PhishDestroy automated monitoring network. It records domain lifecycle updates, scanner changes, and threat telemetry over time.
Threat First Observed2026-10-11 11:34:20 UTC
Domain ingestion complete. Initial state is marked as alive pointing to IP 172.67.150.130.
위협 대응 Pipeline
발견
Analysis
Notifications
Monitoring
6 recorded events. These records describe collected evidence, outgoing notifications and publication; they do not confirm a complete investigation or a takedown.
We scan suspicious URLs, inspect public results and send evidence through the appropriate abuse-reporting channels. The dated events above show what is recorded for this domain. The directory below explains the wider workflow.
01Public scans & evidence collection10 sources and tool groups+
Inspect the public DNS, TLS, HTTP and technology surface.
02Abuse reports & follow-upRegistrar, hosting and security channels+
Identify the responsible provider. Match registration and hosting records to the relevant abuse contact.
Prepare an evidence package. Include the URL, public scan references, captures and the recorded observations.
Send the report. Keep outgoing report records and recipient information when available.
Recheck and publish updates. Track later scanner verdicts, provider responses and site availability.
Security services used for scanning, reputation checks and reporting are listed below. A service being listed is not evidence that it received, accepted or acted on this particular domain. Recorded submissions appear in the notification history above.
Blocklist hits included with submission:MetaMask, SEAL
PDF notice generated Notice text archived (856 chars)
Abuse notice text as sent to the provider
AUP & Terms of Service Violations:
Acceptable Use Policy: Active phishing operations targeting internet users directly violate standard AUP provisions prohibiting fraud and deceptive practices.
Terms of Service: Material breach of service terms regarding malicious use, providing contractual justification for immediate suspension.
Applicable Legal Framework (Unknown):
International Anti-Cybercrime Regulations
Budapest Convention on Cybercrime
Universal Fraud Prevention Laws
Phishing activities violate international cybercrime conventions and Unknown's domestic fraud laws.
Investigation Notice: We fully respect your internal investigation processes and discretion. Prompt remediation protects innocent users while mitigating regulatory compliance scrutiny, legal liability, and brand reputation risks associated with ongoing malicious infrastructure.
보고서 
