탐지를 보고하는 보안 엔진: 7. 극도의 주의를 기울이십시오 — 자격 증명이나 개인 정보를 입력하지 마십시오.
ABUSE NOTICE · 7D+ OPEN
Outgoing abuse reports are recorded; the latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable.
Notification and current-status evidence
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@rashost.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 9 days has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations.
This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
As recorded on 2026-10-02, apexeltech.shop appeared in a PhishDestroy internal listing. The domain also received a PageSpeed performance score of 77 on the same day, indicating a recorded measurement of site responsiveness.
Recorded Evidence
VirusTotal recorded 7 detections from 91 scanners for apexeltech.shop on 2026-09-11. OTX noted 1 pulse for the domain on 2026-10-02. The domain was included in the PhishDestroy internal listing as of 2026-10-02. PageSpeed measured a performance score of 77 for apexeltech.shop on 2026-10-02.
Interpretation
The VirusTotal and OTX observations provide distinct records of scanner detections and pulse activity, each tied to their own dates. The PhishDestroy listing reflects a catalogue entry, while the PageSpeed score represents a technical measurement of site performance. These records offer separate perspectives and do not indicate a unified trend or outcome.
Recommended Actions
For apexeltech.shop, retain the VirusTotal, OTX, PhishDestroy, and PageSpeed records to support future comparisons. Use each source's own definitions and observation dates when reviewing subsequent evidence. Compare later VirusTotal and OTX results against these initial records, maintaining source-specific context throughout the review.
탐지 회피 분석
클로킹 및 트래픽 분산 점검
아직 스캔되지 않았습니다크롤러와 브라우저 간의 차이는 아직 보고된 바가 없습니다.
이 호스트에 대해 저장된 크롤러 대 브라우저 관측 데이터와, 케이타로 스타일의 트래픽 분배 시스템을 위한 실시간 지문 확인 정보.
저장된 은신 플래그
아직 스캔되지 않았습니다
마지막 은폐 스캔
스캐너 메모:unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='apexeltech.shop', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionError
TDS 지문 인식 실시간 확인
이 패널이 열려 있을 때 PhishDestroy 스캐너에서 실행되는 7개의 케이타로 지문과 크롤러 대 브라우저 비교 결과.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Primary outcomeDNS 비활성reason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation알 수 없음Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-11 10:08:34 UTC
RDAP registration알 수 없음
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-10-10 10:07:44 UTClast content: 2026-10-10 10:07:44 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-10-10 20:20:48 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-10-10 10:07:44 UTC → 2026-10-10 20:20:48 UTC · 10.22hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-10-10 15:14:16 UTC · precision medium · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
기술 · 1 identified
H
HTTP/3
Miscellaneous
HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of apexeltech.shop· checked Oct 2, 2026
77
Needs Work
Performance
FCP
2.86s
First Contentful Paint
LCP
4.95s
Largest Contentful Paint
CLS
0.005
Cumulative Layout Shift
TBT
52ms
Total Blocking Time
SI
2.86s
Speed Index
Powered by Google PageSpeed Insights · Mobile strategy · Scores: 90-100 Good50-89 Needs Work0-49 Poor
Forensic History & Detection Timeline
ThreatLifecycleTelemetry
This timeline displays historical security and status checkpoints observed by the PhishDestroy automated monitoring network. It records domain lifecycle updates, scanner changes, and threat telemetry over time.
Threat First Observed2026-10-02 18:19:47 UTC
Domain ingestion complete. Initial state is marked as alive pointing to IP 212.52.28.20.
위협 대응 Pipeline
발견
Analysis
Notifications
Monitoring
12 recorded events. These records describe collected evidence, outgoing notifications and publication; they do not confirm a complete investigation or a takedown.
A stored Cloudflare Radar report is available. The report link alone is not a malicious verdict and does not prove that every network field was captured.
Web Archive
Preserved in 웨이백 머신 — historical evidence archived
We scan suspicious URLs, inspect public results and send evidence through the appropriate abuse-reporting channels. The dated events above show what is recorded for this domain. The directory below explains the wider workflow.
01Public scans & evidence collection10 sources and tool groups+
Inspect the public DNS, TLS, HTTP and technology surface.
02Abuse reports & follow-upRegistrar, hosting and security channels+
Identify the responsible provider. Match registration and hosting records to the relevant abuse contact.
Prepare an evidence package. Include the URL, public scan references, captures and the recorded observations.
Send the report. Keep outgoing report records and recipient information when available.
Recheck and publish updates. Track later scanner verdicts, provider responses and site availability.
Security services used for scanning, reputation checks and reporting are listed below. A service being listed is not evidence that it received, accepted or acted on this particular domain. Recorded submissions appear in the notification history above.
PDF notice generated Notice text archived (650 chars)
Abuse notice text as sent to the provider
Policy Violations:
Illegal Activities: Active phishing operation targeting victims
Fraud & Deception: Impersonation of legitimate services
Identity Theft: Collection of credentials under false pretenses
Applicable Laws (Unknown):
International Anti-Cybercrime Regulations
Budapest Convention on Cybercrime
Universal Fraud Prevention Laws
Phishing activities violate international cybercrime conventions and Unknown's domestic fraud laws.
Action Required: This evidence-backed report demonstrates clear violations requiring suspension per your policies. Continued hosting exposes your organization to regulatory scrutiny and potential legal liability.
