VirusTotal
18 / 91
“Files”
rft28.vercel.app — 最後に確認されたアクティブな状態 (HTTP 200). ブランドの偽装: Adobe; 詐欺タイプ: Impersonation. 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 18/91 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, CyRadar, ESET, Emsisoft); URLScan malicious verdict; PhishDestroy score 100/100. レジストラ: Vercel.
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
rft28.vercel.app returned HTTP status 200 on 2026-10-01, according to the recorded HTTP check. The same record set shows a first observation date of 2026-09-17, which is earlier than the HTTP check.
The HTTP check on 2026-10-01 recorded status 200 for rft28.vercel.app. The first observation date in the evidence is 2026-09-17. VirusTotal reported 18 detections across 91 scanners on 2026-10-01. The SSL certificate was scanned on 2026-09-23 and its issuer was Google Trust Services / WR1. The PhishDestroy internal listing was recorded as true, and the blocklist check date was 2026-10-01.
The VirusTotal figures and the HTTP status come from the same 2026-10-01 check, so they describe one point in time. The SSL scan on 2026-09-23 and the first observation on 2026-09-17 fall on different dates, so they cannot be directly aligned with the later checks. The PhishDestroy listing and the blocklist check share the 2026-10-01 date, which allows those two records to be compared together.
Reviewers should retain the dated records for rft28.vercel.app, including the HTTP check and the VirusTotal result, so later observations can be compared against them. Any subsequent check of rft28.vercel.app should be logged with its own date to show how the recorded values change over time. During review, avoid submitting sensitive information to rft28.vercel.app until the recorded status and detections have been reassessed.
このホストに関するクローラーとブラウザの観測データの蓄積に加え、ケイタロ式トラフィック分散システム向けのリアルタイムフィンガープリントチェック。
Vercelスキャナーに関する注記: alive_content: raw=ok; http=200; via=https_proxy; server=Vercel
Edge-IP の評判はこのドメインに起因しません。
Location describes the IP network.
8f46c4a0a289bfde4060d06986f2af761ee62d668dde972e6bef4687ee4f6093Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
9 recorded events. These records describe collected evidence, outgoing notifications and publication; they do not confirm a complete investigation or a takedown.
We scan suspicious URLs, inspect public results and send evidence through the appropriate abuse-reporting channels. The dated events above show what is recorded for this domain. The directory below explains the wider workflow.
Capture the rendered page, requests and visible infrastructure.
Compare the available engine results and retain the analysis timestamp.
Check whether Google currently lists the URL as unsafe.
Inspect a public scan and its recorded network and classification data.
Look for indicator references and related community intelligence.
Compare archived captures and preserve historical context.
Look for matching indicators and associated threat records.
Inspect certificate records and related hostnames.
Compare security resolver responses and record observed blocking.
Inspect the public DNS, TLS, HTTP and technology surface.
Security services used for scanning, reputation checks and reporting are listed below. A service being listed is not evidence that it received, accepted or acted on this particular domain. Recorded submissions appear in the notification history above.
アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください