barefootshoesaustraliawear.shop was observed with an HTTP status of 200 on 2026-10-11, documenting a successful response at that time. The domain also appeared in a publisher-owned PhishDestroy internal listing as recorded evidence.
Recorded Evidence
OTX pulses were recorded for barefootshoesaustraliawear.shop on 2026-10-11, providing four distinct entries. The HTTP status observation on 2026-10-11 documented a response code of 200. On the same date, the domain was listed in the PhishDestroy internal catalogue and a URLScan report was available. The SSL certificate was issued by Let's Encrypt / YE1 and scanned on 2026-10-11.
Interpretation
The PhishDestroy internal listing contains a record of barefootshoesaustraliawear.shop, which is a catalogue entry maintained by the publisher. The HTTP status source documents a specific technical response from the domain, measuring its accessibility on a particular date. OTX pulses provide additional external intelligence entries, each representing an individual observation relevant to the domain. The scope of these records is limited to the dates and types of measurements provided.
Recommended Actions
Preserve the PhishDestroy internal listing for barefootshoesaustraliawear.shop as a reference for future comparison. Retain the HTTP status and OTX pulses records to track any changes in technical responses or external intelligence entries. Review the URLScan report for additional context and maintain all dated evidence for ongoing monitoring efforts.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Evidence layersAvailability: Content servingContent: Content served at rootDNS: ResolvedRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observationコンテンツ公開中Ordinary HTTP content served90%2026-10-11 10:00:24 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-10-11 10:00:24 UTClast content: 2026-10-11 10:00:24 UTC
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
This timeline displays historical security and status checkpoints observed by the PhishDestroy automated monitoring network. It records domain lifecycle updates, scanner changes, and threat telemetry over time.
Threat First Observed2026-10-10 23:02:04 UTC
Domain ingestion complete. Initial state is marked as alive pointing to IP 162.222.90.34.
脅威対応 Pipeline
ディスカバリー
Analysis
Notifications
Monitoring
9 recorded events. These records describe collected evidence, outgoing notifications and publication; they do not confirm a complete investigation or a takedown.
We scan suspicious URLs, inspect public results and send evidence through the appropriate abuse-reporting channels. The dated events above show what is recorded for this domain. The directory below explains the wider workflow.
01Public scans & evidence collection10 sources and tool groups+
Inspect the public DNS, TLS, HTTP and technology surface.
02Abuse reports & follow-upRegistrar, hosting and security channels+
Identify the responsible provider. Match registration and hosting records to the relevant abuse contact.
Prepare an evidence package. Include the URL, public scan references, captures and the recorded observations.
Send the report. Keep outgoing report records and recipient information when available.
Recheck and publish updates. Track later scanner verdicts, provider responses and site availability.
Security services used for scanning, reputation checks and reporting are listed below. A service being listed is not evidence that it received, accepted or acted on this particular domain. Recorded submissions appear in the notification history above.
PDF notice generated Notice text archived (856 chars)
Abuse notice text as sent to the provider
AUP & Terms of Service Violations:
Acceptable Use Policy: Active phishing operations targeting internet users directly violate standard AUP provisions prohibiting fraud and deceptive practices.
Terms of Service: Material breach of service terms regarding malicious use, providing contractual justification for immediate suspension.
Applicable Legal Framework (Unknown):
International Anti-Cybercrime Regulations
Budapest Convention on Cybercrime
Universal Fraud Prevention Laws
Phishing activities violate international cybercrime conventions and Unknown's domestic fraud laws.
Investigation Notice: We fully respect your internal investigation processes and discretion. Prompt remediation protects innocent users while mitigating regulatory compliance scrutiny, legal liability, and brand reputation risks associated with ongoing malicious infrastructure.
