VirusTotal
3 / 89 engine detections
Apri il rapporto“Vote 0x39...4571 — pons”
Dominio in blocklist: pons-voting-3i.netlify.app — Contenuto non disponibile (HTTP 404). Riepilogo delle prove: VirusTotal 3/89 (alphaMountain.ai, Forcepoint…
L’analisi dettagliata di PhishDestroy AI resta in inglese per preservare il rapporto forense originale.
3 / 89 engine detections
Apri il rapportono community references
Apri il rapportoprovider verdict: clean
Apri il rapportoNo threat flag
Apri il rapportoNo malicious flag
Apri il rapportoResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
pons-voting-3i.netlify.app is an impersonation phishing page that posed as a voting portal for Pons. Its title, "Vote 0x39...4571 — pons", presented it as an on-chain proposal or delegate vote, which targets token holders and community members who expect governance links. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-09-15. It went offline on 2026-09-16, and as of 2026-10-19 the root returns no content.
Fake governance pages rely on urgency. A link circulates in chats or replies, claiming a vote is closing or that participation earns rewards. To cast a ballot, the visitor must connect a wallet and approve a request. Instead of a harmless vote signature, a page like this can ask for token approvals or signed permits that let the operator move assets. The truncated address in the title imitates a real proposal or delegate reference so that the request looks routine.
VirusTotal returned 3 detections out of 89 engines on 2026-09-17, from alphaMountain.ai, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker and VIPRE. That count is low, partly because the scan ran after the page had already gone dark. The stronger signal comes from wallet-focused blocklists. MetaMask and SEAL list the domain alongside PhishDestroy, so MetaMask users should see a warning if the page returns.
The page sat on a free Netlify subdomain, served from Amazon infrastructure in Germany. Throwaway platform subdomains like this cost nothing, deploy in seconds and are easy to abandon. That fits a page that lasted roughly a day after PhishDestroy spotted it. Its DigiCert certificate is Netlify's standard platform certificate, so the padlock says nothing about who operated the site.
If you connected a wallet here, check its token approvals and permit signatures with a reputable revocation tool. Revoke anything you do not recognise, and move remaining funds to a fresh wallet if you signed anything. Never vote through links shared in DMs or replies. Reach governance only through the project's official site or a verified voting platform. Defenders should block the domain, watch for sibling Netlify subdomains with similar "voting" names, and report new copies to Netlify and the wallet blocklists.
Full extracted values, their blockchain and collection source. An address found in page content does not establish who controls it.
0x39dBED3a2bd333467115dE45665cC57F813C4571Format validated · Domain analysisIoC extraction recorded 2026-09-16 04:00:21 UTC
Last checked
La reputazione Edge-IP non è attribuita a questo dominio.
Location describes the IP network.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of pons-voting-3i.netlify.app · checked Sep 15, 2026
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
pons-voting-3i.netlify.app
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Sconosciuto→inactive
http_no_content
Sconosciuto→inactive
http_no_content
Sconosciuto→inactive
http_no_content
Sconosciuto→inactive
http_no_content
Sconosciuto→inactive
http_no_content
Sconosciuto→inactive
http_no_content
Sconosciuto→inactive
http_no_content
Sconosciuto→inactive
http_no_content
Sconosciuto→inactive
http_no_content
0→3
Raggiungibile→Non disponibile
No threat flag
View source3/89 engine detections
View sourcepons-voting-3i.netlify.app
View sourceListed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
Se hai inserito credenziali dell'account, informazioni personali o di pagamento oppure hai scaricato un file da questo dominio, agisci immediatamente. Di seguito sono riportate le risorse per aiutarti a segnalare l'incidente e proteggerti.
Seleziona il tuo Paese per ottenere contatti ufficiali del crimine informatico o creare una bozza di reclamo →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
pons-voting-3i.netlify.app)Anche se non conosci tutti i dettagli — sporgere comunque denuncia. Anche le informazioni parziali sono comunque utili alle indagini.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Analisi delle minacce utilizzando blocklist archiviate, WHOIS, DNS e prove di scansione pubblica
Scansiona oraSegnala i domini sospetti al nostro database delle minacce — proteggi la comunità
SegnalaSegnalazioni recenti di phishing e modifiche osservate della disponibilità
MonitoraControlla le minacce in tempo reale oppure contesta questa segnalazione se ritieni che si tratti di un falso positivo
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.