VirusTotal
14 / 89
MeldenEngine detections from this stored analysis. Vendors and collection times may differ from other sources.
Assessment based on the stored source evidence below. Review sources →
ripple.giving — Inhalt nicht verfügbar. Markenidentität: XRP; Betrugstyp: Brand Impersonation. Zusammenfassung der Beweislage: VirusTotal 14/89 (ADMINUSLabs, alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, Chong Lua Dao, CRDF); URLQuery 1 alert; 4 external blocklist matches; PhishDestroy score 100/100.
Die ausführliche Analyse von PhishDestroy AI bleibt auf Englisch, damit der ursprüngliche forensische Bericht unverändert bleibt.
These are dated observations, not a live safety check. No flag, a stored capture, or a completed analysis does not establish that a site is safe.
14 / 89
MeldenEngine detections from this stored analysis. Vendors and collection times may differ from other sources.
1 threat-system alert
MeldenAlerts refer to the preserved scan. They do not describe the current state of the site.
4 external matches
DetailsA result applies to the recorded source and observation time. Absence of a flag is not proof of safety.
1 community reference
MeldenCommunity publication references, not a vendor verdict or evidence of a common operator.
gespeicherter Bericht
A preserved page image documents what the collector received; a capture is not a safety verdict.
Analyse abgeschlossen
MeldenThis is the recorded automated analysis. Completion alone is not a safety verdict.
Checked; no threat flag recorded
MeldenA result applies to the recorded source and observation time. Absence of a flag is not proof of safety.
| Detection System | Indicator | Verdict | Alert |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quad9 DNS | ripple.giving |
malicious | Sinkholed |
AI-assisted analysis Stored narrative · generated . Provider checks below retain their own observation dates. This narrative is an interpretation of collected evidence, not an independent source verdict.
This domain, ripple.giving, poses a high-risk threat as a crypto wallet drainer targeting users of the XRP cryptocurrency. Analysis indicates the domain is designed to mimic legitimate XRP-related services, tricking victims into connecting their wallets to malicious smart contracts. Once connected, the drainer siphons funds by executing unauthorized transactions, often leaving victims with empty wallets and no recourse for recovery. The threat is particularly insidious due to its use of brand impersonation, leveraging the trust associated with the XRP name to deceive users into compromising their assets. Infrastructure analysis reveals the domain was registered on February 21, 2026, and has since been flagged by 12 out of 95 security vendors on VirusTotal. Additionally, the domain appears on five independent security blocklists, further confirming its malicious intent. The registrar details, while not publicly disclosed in this report, align with patterns observed in other high-risk crypto drainer campaigns. The domain's current offline status suggests takedown efforts, but similar domains often re-emerge under different names or TLDs, maintaining the threat landscape. Users who visited ripple.giving or interacted with any associated links should immediately revoke all wallet permissions granted to unknown or suspicious contracts. It is critical to audit wallet activity for unauthorized transactions and transfer remaining funds to a new, secure wallet. Additionally, users should monitor their devices for malware, as crypto drainers often deploy secondary payloads to maintain persistence. If financial loss occurred, report the incident to relevant authorities and provide all transaction hashes, timestamps, and domain interaction details for further investigation. Proactive measures, such as verifying domain legitimacy and avoiding unsolicited wallet connection requests, are essential to mitigate future risks.
17 · datasets with records / 14 · not recorded
What this report contains, where it came from, and when it was collected. A retained record can be incomplete; collection status is separate from the threat assessment.
These checks have no retained result. This does not mean they passed or that a scan is running.
4 · external source matches
104.21.64.1 · DNS, TLS and retained responses
Die Edge-IP-Reputation wird dieser Domäne nicht zugeordnet.
Location describes the IP network.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Stored browser and crawler observations
Gespeicherte Beobachtungen zum Vergleich zwischen Crawler und Browser für diesen Host sowie eine Echtzeit-Fingerabdruckprüfung für Verkehrsverteilungssysteme im Keitaro-Stil.
Anmerkung des Scanners: unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='ripple.giving', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionError("
Collection history, report status and investigation channels
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Unbekannt→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive→Unbekannt
probe_inconclusive
Unbekannt→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive→Unbekannt
probe_inconclusive
Unbekannt→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive→Unbekannt
probe_inconclusive
Unbekannt→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive→Unbekannt
probe_inconclusive
Unbekannt→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive→Unbekannt
origin_unreachable · http_5xx
Unbekannt→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive→Unbekannt
origin_unreachable · http_5xx
Unbekannt→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive→Unbekannt
origin_unreachable · http_5xx
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
11 recorded events. These records describe collected evidence, outgoing notifications and publication; they do not confirm a complete investigation or a takedown.
We scan suspicious URLs, inspect public results and send evidence through the appropriate abuse-reporting channels. The dated events above show what is recorded for this domain. The directory below explains the wider workflow.
Capture the rendered page, requests and visible infrastructure.
Compare the available engine results and retain the analysis timestamp.
Check whether Google currently lists the URL as unsafe.
Inspect a public scan and its recorded network and classification data.
Look for indicator references and related community intelligence.
Compare archived captures and preserve historical context.
Look for matching indicators and associated threat records.
Inspect certificate records and related hostnames.
Compare security resolver responses and record observed blocking.
Inspect the public DNS, TLS, HTTP and technology surface.
Security services used for scanning, reputation checks and reporting are listed below. A service being listed is not evidence that it received, accepted or acted on this particular domain. Recorded submissions appear in the notification history above.
Shared hosting, registrar records and related domains
Retained community reports and observations
1 Community-Meldung
KategoriePHISHING
Malicious Website
Von 1 Community-Mitglied gemeldet; erstmals gesehen am 09.08.2025
Original reports, independent checks and evidence links
“Malicious Website”
Recovery steps, reporting contacts and complaint drafts
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
Wenn Sie Kontoanmeldeinformationen, persönliche oder Zahlungsinformationen eingegeben oder eine Datei von dieser Domain heruntergeladen haben, ergreifen Sie sofort Maßnahmen. Nachfolgend finden Sie Ressourcen, die Ihnen helfen, den Vorfall zu melden und sich zu schützen.
Wählen Sie Ihr Land aus, um Offizielle Kontakte im Bereich Cyberkriminalität oder einen Beschwerdeentwurf erstellen → zu erhalten.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
ripple.giving)Auch wenn dir nicht alle Details bekannt sind — trotzdem Anzeige erstatten. Auch unvollständige Informationen sind für die Ermittlungen hilfreich.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Bedrohungsanalyse anhand gespeicherter Blocklisten, WHOIS, DNS und öffentlicher Scan-Beweise
Jetzt scannenMelden Sie verdächtige Domains an unsere Bedrohungsdatenbank – schützen Sie die Community
MeldenAktuelle Phishing-Meldungen und beobachtete Verfügbarkeitsänderungen
ÜberwachenBeobachten Sie aktuelle Bedrohungen oder legen Sie Widerspruch gegen diesen Eintrag ein, wenn Sie der Meinung sind, dass es sich um einen Fehlalarm handelt
Dieser Bericht präsentiert die neuesten gespeicherten Beweise, die PhishDestroy zur Verfügung stehen. Quellzeitstempel werden angezeigt, sofern verfügbar; Verfügbarkeit und Verkäuferurteile können sich nach der Abholung ändern.
Stand 2026-09-11 02:32:47 UTC, ripple.giving hatte Erkennungen von 14-Sicherheitsmodulen.
Each source records a particular observation. A screenshot, an available website, or a result with no detections does not establish that a site is safe. Source results can change after they are collected.
Wenn Sie glauben, dass diese Auflistung ungenau ist, einen Einspruch einlegen. Um mehr über unsere Methodik zu erfahren, besuchen Sie FAQ-Seite.