VirusTotal
14 / 89
“Can’t Find the Server”
trezorsecure.io — 内容不可用. 品牌冒充:Google; 诈骗类型:Impersonation. 证据摘要: VirusTotal 14/89 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, Chong Lua Dao, CRDF, CyRadar); 2 external blocklist matches (MetaMask, SEAL); PhishDestroy score 92/100. 注册商: Devexpanse.
为保留原始取证记录,下方的 PhishDestroy AI 详细分析仍使用英文。
Stored evidence for trezorsecure.io: VirusTotal recorded 11 detections among 89 scanners on 2026-09-08. That ratio reproduces the stored check in its original units and is not converted into another measure. MetaMask and SEAL appear as named external blocklist observations for trezorsecure.io. Each item in this report remains at the scope supplied by its dated source record.
VirusTotal records 11 detections among 89 scanners in the stored snapshot dated 2026-09-08. The numerator describes scanners that produced detections, while the denominator describes scanners included in that check. The reverse order would materially alter the stored result. The VirusTotal snapshot dated 2026-09-08 supplies no common rationale covering the included scanners, and this report adds none. A later VirusTotal snapshot may contain different values, so any comparison should preserve the exact ratio and date of each snapshot.
MetaMask and SEAL are recorded as named external blocklist observations for trezorsecure.io in the snapshot dated 2026-09-08. The stored MetaMask and SEAL blocklist records supply names and entries, but they supply no shared method or common rationale. PhishDestroy’s catalogue also contains trezorsecure.io as a publisher record. That PhishDestroy record is counted separately from the MetaMask and SEAL external blocklist observations. This separation keeps the origin of every entry visible and prevents a single stored item from being counted again under another source label.
The record first observed trezorsecure.io on 2026-09-08. The MetaMask and SEAL blocklist snapshot is dated 2026-09-08 and remains a separate event in the stored timeline. The registration date is separately recorded as 2026-08-31. A URLScan reference was stored on 2026-09-08 as a dated artifact for review. Each timestamp qualifies only the adjacent observation in this timeline. Later collection results should be compared with these dated values without replacing the earlier snapshot.
The source stores 192.142.55.227 as the observed address in this record. The registration date for trezorsecure.io is recorded as 2026-08-31. The SSL issuer is recorded as Let's Encrypt / YR1 in the snapshot dated 2026-09-08. The stored ASN observation records 214036 and Ultahost, Inc. in this record. These fields preserve registration, network, and certificate context stored in this record. The report preserves each label and number as a separate source value instead of combining them into an invented aggregate. Keeping the fields separate leaves every infrastructure value traceable to the record that supplied it.
The trezorsecure.io record states that VirusTotal recorded 11 detections among 89 scanners on 2026-09-08. MetaMask and SEAL remain named blocklist observations from the snapshot dated 2026-09-08. PhishDestroy remains a separate publisher catalogue entry in the stored record. The observed address field in this record contains 192.142.55.227. The supported conclusion is bounded to the exact stored observations for trezorsecure.io. Any statement beyond those source values would require additional dated material.
Avoid submitting sensitive information to trezorsecure.io during review. Use a known service address obtained separately from this report for any necessary access. Defenders can retain trezorsecure.io as an exact indicator and preserve relevant DNS, proxy, and endpoint records. Compare later VirusTotal snapshots and MetaMask and SEAL blocklist records with the dated values above instead of replacing them. Keep each later observation with its source date so changes remain visible during follow-up review. If a defensive rule is needed, keep its scope to trezorsecure.io. The stored record does not justify extending that rule to 192.142.55.227 or to other infrastructure records.
针对该主机的爬虫与浏览器观察记录,以及针对“Keitaro”式流量分配系统的实时指纹检测。
扫描说明: unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='trezorsecure.io', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionError
dns1.hosted-domains.netdns2.hosted-domains.netdns3.hosted-domains.netdns4.hosted-domains.netLocation describes the IP network.
93e18ee8dd8468d6f9508474773ab02008717c9e2a580ea32d0537063ecade4cwww.trezorsecure.ioSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of trezorsecure.io · checked Sep 8, 2026
192.142.55.227. 13 recorded events. These records describe collected evidence, outgoing notifications and publication; they do not confirm a complete investigation or a takedown.
We scan suspicious URLs, inspect public results and send evidence through the appropriate abuse-reporting channels. The dated events above show what is recorded for this domain. The directory below explains the wider workflow.
Capture the rendered page, requests and visible infrastructure.
Compare the available engine results and retain the analysis timestamp.
Check whether Google currently lists the URL as unsafe.
Inspect a public scan and its recorded network and classification data.
Look for indicator references and related community intelligence.
Compare archived captures and preserve historical context.
Look for matching indicators and associated threat records.
Inspect certificate records and related hostnames.
Compare security resolver responses and record observed blocking.
Inspect the public DNS, TLS, HTTP and technology surface.
Security services used for scanning, reputation checks and reporting are listed below. A service being listed is not evidence that it received, accepted or acted on this particular domain. Recorded submissions appear in the notification history above.
1 条社区报告
类别IMPERSONATION
On the evening of 3 September 2026 and into the early hours of 4 September 2026, I was the victim of a prolonged and coordinated cryptocurrency fraud involving impersonation of the Metropolitan Police, Trezor and Cake Wallet. The fraud began at approximately 8:04 p.m. with a t
“On the evening of 3 September 2026 and into the early hours of 4 September 2026, I was the victim of a prolonged and coordinated cryptocurrency fraud involving impersonation of the Metropolitan Police, Trezor and Cake Wallet. The fraud began at approximately 8:04 p.m. with a telephone call from an individual claiming to be a Metropolitan Police officer, lasting approximately 19 minutes. A second call from the same number began at approximately 8:24 p.m. and lasted approximately 1 hour 25 minu”
如果您输入了帐户凭据、个人或付款信息,或者从此域下载了文件,请立即采取措施。以下资源可帮助您报告事件并保护自己。
选择您所在的国家/地区以获取 官方网络犯罪联系人 或 创建投诉草稿 →。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent