ABUSE NOTICE · 7D+ OPEN
Outgoing abuse reports are recorded; the latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable.
Notification and current-status evidence
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@forticore.digital.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 7 days has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations.
This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
ratefn.com returned an HTTP 200 status on 2026-10-07, indicating a successful response at that time. The domain was also listed in the internal PhishDestroy catalogue as of the same period.
Recorded Evidence
On 2026-10-07, ratefn.com produced an HTTP 200 status code. VirusTotal checked the domain on 2026-10-07 and reported 0 detections out of 92 scanners. OTX had four pulses mentioning the domain as of 2026-10-07. The domain was registered with Dominet (HK) Limited on 2026-08-11 and had an SSL certificate issued by Let's Encrypt / YR1, scanned on 2026-10-07. The internal PhishDestroy listing was also recorded.
Interpretation
These records show that ratefn.com was accessible and had been reviewed by several security sources, each providing different types of observations. The presence of OTX pulses and an internal listing suggests the domain has attracted attention from threat intelligence and catalogue sources, while VirusTotal's results indicate no detections among its scanners at the time of review. The registration and SSL details provide context for the domain's setup and security posture as observed.
Recommended Actions
For any further review or monitoring of ratefn.com, reference the HTTP response, VirusTotal scan, OTX pulses, and PhishDestroy internal listing as distinct sources. Preserve these records for future comparison to track any changes in the domain’s status or security profile.
探测与规避分析
隐身和流量分配检查
尚未扫描目前尚未记录到爬虫与浏览器之间的差异
针对该主机的爬虫与浏览器观察记录，以及针对“Keitaro”式流量分配系统的实时指纹检测。
存储的隐身标志
尚未扫描
上次隐形扫描
扫描说明:unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='ratefn.com', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionError("SOC
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Primary outcomeDNS 非活动reason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation未知Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-13 22:07:58 UTC
RDAP registration未知
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-10-09 10:07:17 UTClast content: 2026-10-09 10:07:17 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-10-09 20:20:42 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-10-09 10:07:17 UTC → 2026-10-09 20:20:42 UTC · 10.22hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-10-09 15:13:59 UTC · precision medium · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
Last analyzed First positive detection Previous stored snapshot: 5 detections
alphaMountain.ai
CRDF
Forcepoint ThreatSeeker
Fortinet
Gridinsoft
SOCRadar
网站性能分析
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of ratefn.com· checked Oct 6, 2026
75
Needs Work
Performance
FCP
4.21s
First Contentful Paint
LCP
4.29s
Largest Contentful Paint
CLS
0
Cumulative Layout Shift
TBT
83ms
Total Blocking Time
SI
4.21s
Speed Index
Powered by Google PageSpeed Insights · Mobile strategy · Scores: 90-100 Good50-89 Needs Work0-49 Poor
Forensic History & Detection Timeline
ThreatLifecycleTelemetry
This timeline displays historical security and status checkpoints observed by the PhishDestroy automated monitoring network. It records domain lifecycle updates, scanner changes, and threat telemetry over time.
Threat First Observed2026-10-06 21:16:32 UTC
Domain ingestion complete. Initial state is marked as unknown pointing to IP 46.29.26.38.
威胁响应 Pipeline
发现
Analysis
Notifications
Monitoring
10 recorded events. These records describe collected evidence, outgoing notifications and publication; they do not confirm a complete investigation or a takedown.
A stored Cloudflare Radar report is available. The report link alone is not a malicious verdict and does not prove that every network field was captured.
We scan suspicious URLs, inspect public results and send evidence through the appropriate abuse-reporting channels. The dated events above show what is recorded for this domain. The directory below explains the wider workflow.
01Public scans & evidence collection10 sources and tool groups+
Inspect the public DNS, TLS, HTTP and technology surface.
02Abuse reports & follow-upRegistrar, hosting and security channels+
Identify the responsible provider. Match registration and hosting records to the relevant abuse contact.
Prepare an evidence package. Include the URL, public scan references, captures and the recorded observations.
Send the report. Keep outgoing report records and recipient information when available.
Recheck and publish updates. Track later scanner verdicts, provider responses and site availability.
Security services used for scanning, reputation checks and reporting are listed below. A service being listed is not evidence that it received, accepted or acted on this particular domain. Recorded submissions appear in the notification history above.
PDF notice generated Notice text archived (594 chars)
Abuse notice text as sent to the provider
Policy Violations:
Illegal Activities: Active phishing operation targeting victims
Fraud & Deception: Impersonation of legitimate services
Identity Theft: Collection of credentials under false pretenses
Applicable Laws (DE):
German Criminal Code § 263 (Fraud)
German Criminal Code § 263a (Computer Fraud)
Telemedia Act (TMG)
German law prohibits fraud and computer-based deception.
Action Required: This evidence-backed report demonstrates clear violations requiring suspension per your policies. Continued hosting exposes your organization to regulatory scrutiny and potential legal liability.
(DE)
