VirusTotal
12 / 89
“Google”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@omegatech.sc.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 1 month has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
paylifeat-info.com — 最后已知的活跃状态 (HTTP 303). 品牌冒充:Google; 诈骗类型:Impersonation. 证据摘要: VirusTotal 12/89 (alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, CyRadar, ESET, Emsisoft); URLQuery 3 alerts; Spamhaus DBL_PHISH; 2 external blocklist matches (MetaMask, SEAL); PhishDestroy score 100/100. 注册商: Name.com.
为保留原始取证记录,下方的 PhishDestroy AI 详细分析仍使用英文。
| Detection System | Indicator | Verdict | Alert |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cloudflare DNS | paylifeat-info.com |
malicious | Sinkholed |
| OpenDNS | paylifeat-info.com |
phishing | Phishing Block |
| DNS4EU | paylifeat-info.com |
malicious | Sinkholed |
安全研究人员发现恶意域名paylifeat-info.com,该域名注册于2026年9月9日,使用Let's Encrypt证书,解析至158.94.208.88。VirusTotal在2026年9月11日的扫描中检测到11/89的恶意标记率,同时MetaMask和SEAL安全插件已将其列入黑名单,PhishDestroy也将其收录为钓鱼站点。攻击者可能通过伪造登录页面诱导用户输入钱包助记词或私钥,从而窃取加密货币资产。建议用户避免访问该域名,并在钱包交易前核实网站真实性。
针对该主机的爬虫与浏览器观察记录,以及针对“Keitaro”式流量分配系统的实时指纹检测。
nginx扫描说明: redirect: raw=redirect_303; http=303; via=https_proxy; location=https://paylifeat-info.com:443/login.php; server=nginx
ns1.vercel-dns.comns2.vercel-dns.comLocation describes the IP network.
8c507ab8289bbf6bfc6082ea8efa5315aebcc6c35f70999c9aa5217ceaaa1368zen-roentgen.158-94-208-88.plesk.pageSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of paylifeat-info.com · checked Sep 11, 2026
158.94.208.88. 12 recorded events. These records describe collected evidence, outgoing notifications and publication; they do not confirm a complete investigation or a takedown.
We scan suspicious URLs, inspect public results and send evidence through the appropriate abuse-reporting channels. The dated events above show what is recorded for this domain. The directory below explains the wider workflow.
Capture the rendered page, requests and visible infrastructure.
Compare the available engine results and retain the analysis timestamp.
Check whether Google currently lists the URL as unsafe.
Inspect a public scan and its recorded network and classification data.
Look for indicator references and related community intelligence.
Compare archived captures and preserve historical context.
Look for matching indicators and associated threat records.
Inspect certificate records and related hostnames.
Compare security resolver responses and record observed blocking.
Inspect the public DNS, TLS, HTTP and technology surface.
Security services used for scanning, reputation checks and reporting are listed below. A service being listed is not evidence that it received, accepted or acted on this particular domain. Recorded submissions appear in the notification history above.
PD-20260911-9D6463 Recipient: abuse@omegatech.sc Policy Violations: Illegal Activities: Active phishing operation targeting victims Fraud & Deception: Impersonation of legitimate services Identity Theft: Collection of credentials under false pretenses Applicable Laws (US): 18 U.S.C. § 1343 - Wire Fraud 18 U.S.C. § 1030 - Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) 15 U.S.C. § 45 - FTC Act (Deceptive Practices) Federal laws prohibit wire fraud, computer fraud, and deceptive business practices. Action Required: This evidence-backed report demonstrates clear violations requiring suspension per your policies. Continued hosting exposes your organization to regulatory scrutiny and potential legal liability.
如果您输入了帐户凭据、个人或付款信息,或者从此域下载了文件,请立即采取措施。以下资源可帮助您报告事件并保护自己。
选择您所在的国家/地区以获取 官方网络犯罪联系人 或 创建投诉草稿 →。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent