ABUSE NOTICE · 72H+ OPEN
Outgoing abuse reports are recorded; the latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable.
Notification and current-status evidence
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@forticore.digital.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 4 days has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations.
This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
The domain fortniterentals.com was noted in the internal PhishDestroy listing on 2026-10-06, and also received a PageSpeed performance score of 75 on the same date. These observations provide both a security and performance perspective for this domain.
Recorded Evidence
On 2026-10-06, fortniterentals.com appeared in the internal PhishDestroy catalogue and was checked by OTX, which recorded 2 pulses. VirusTotal scanned the domain on 2026-07-04, reporting 0 detections out of 92 total scanners. The domain's registrar is Hello Internet Corp, and it was registered on 2026-03-08. A PageSpeed performance score of 75 was recorded on 2026-10-06.
Interpretation
The records from OTX, VirusTotal, and PhishDestroy offer a multi-faceted view of fortniterentals.com, reflecting both security monitoring and web performance. These dated entries allow for comparison across different types of observations, highlighting how the domain has been tracked by various monitoring services.
Recommended Actions
For fortniterentals.com, it is important to preserve the OTX, VirusTotal, and PhishDestroy source records for future reference. Comparing subsequent OTX pulses and VirusTotal scans to these records will help monitor any changes. Tracking the PageSpeed performance score over time can also provide insight into shifts in web performance.
探测与规避分析
隐身和流量分配检查
尚未扫描目前尚未记录到爬虫与浏览器之间的差异
针对该主机的爬虫与浏览器观察记录，以及针对“Keitaro”式流量分配系统的实时指纹检测。
存储的隐身标志
尚未扫描
上次隐形扫描
扫描说明:unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='fortniterentals.com', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionE
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Primary outcomeDNS 非活动reason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation未知Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-11 10:08:01 UTC
RDAP registration未知
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-10-09 10:07:13 UTClast content: 2026-10-09 10:07:13 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-10-09 20:20:42 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-10-09 10:07:13 UTC → 2026-10-09 20:20:42 UTC · 10.22hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-10-09 15:13:57 UTC · precision medium · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
Last analyzed First positive detection Previous stored snapshot: 0 detections
alphaMountain.ai
BitDefender
ESET
Emsisoft
Forcepoint ThreatSeeker
Fortinet
G-Data
卡巴斯基
LevelBlue
Netcraft
网站性能分析
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of fortniterentals.com· checked Oct 6, 2026
75
Needs Work
Performance
FCP
4.07s
First Contentful Paint
LCP
4.14s
Largest Contentful Paint
CLS
0
Cumulative Layout Shift
TBT
71ms
Total Blocking Time
SI
4.99s
Speed Index
Powered by Google PageSpeed Insights · Mobile strategy · Scores: 90-100 Good50-89 Needs Work0-49 Poor
Forensic History & Detection Timeline
ThreatLifecycleTelemetry
This timeline displays historical security and status checkpoints observed by the PhishDestroy automated monitoring network. It records domain lifecycle updates, scanner changes, and threat telemetry over time.
Threat First Observed2026-10-06 21:03:56 UTC
Domain ingestion complete. Initial state is marked as alive pointing to IP 46.29.26.38.
威胁响应 Pipeline
发现
Analysis
Notifications
Monitoring
9 recorded events. These records describe collected evidence, outgoing notifications and publication; they do not confirm a complete investigation or a takedown.
A stored Cloudflare Radar report is available. The report link alone is not a malicious verdict and does not prove that every network field was captured.
We scan suspicious URLs, inspect public results and send evidence through the appropriate abuse-reporting channels. The dated events above show what is recorded for this domain. The directory below explains the wider workflow.
01Public scans & evidence collection10 sources and tool groups+
Inspect the public DNS, TLS, HTTP and technology surface.
02Abuse reports & follow-upRegistrar, hosting and security channels+
Identify the responsible provider. Match registration and hosting records to the relevant abuse contact.
Prepare an evidence package. Include the URL, public scan references, captures and the recorded observations.
Send the report. Keep outgoing report records and recipient information when available.
Recheck and publish updates. Track later scanner verdicts, provider responses and site availability.
Security services used for scanning, reputation checks and reporting are listed below. A service being listed is not evidence that it received, accepted or acted on this particular domain. Recorded submissions appear in the notification history above.
PDF notice generated Notice text archived (650 chars)
Abuse notice text as sent to the provider
Policy Violations:
Illegal Activities: Active phishing operation targeting victims
Fraud & Deception: Impersonation of legitimate services
Identity Theft: Collection of credentials under false pretenses
Applicable Laws (Unknown):
International Anti-Cybercrime Regulations
Budapest Convention on Cybercrime
Universal Fraud Prevention Laws
Phishing activities violate international cybercrime conventions and Unknown's domestic fraud laws.
Action Required: This evidence-backed report demonstrates clear violations requiring suspension per your policies. Continued hosting exposes your organization to regulatory scrutiny and potential legal liability.
(US)
