The domain baysebrandstore.shop returned an HTTP status 200 on 2026-10-11, documenting a successful response at that time. The domain was also observed in the publisher-owned PhishDestroy internal listing, which records domains for further monitoring.
Recorded Evidence
On 2026-10-11, the HTTP status source recorded a 200 response for baysebrandstore.shop. The same date shows the domain listed in the PhishDestroy internal catalogue. OTX records four pulses referencing the domain as of 2026-10-11. URLScan reported an available scan for baysebrandstore.shop on 2026-10-11, capturing additional technical details.
Interpretation
The PhishDestroy internal listing contains a record of baysebrandstore.shop, documenting its inclusion for ongoing review. The HTTP status source measures the domain’s response code, providing a technical snapshot of its accessibility on the recorded date. OTX pulses represent external intelligence entries, each referencing the domain and capturing related observations. These sources together offer a timeline and scope for comparing technical and intelligence records.
Recommended Actions
For baysebrandstore.shop, preserve the HTTP status, PhishDestroy internal listing, OTX pulses, and URLScan report as distinct records for future reference. Compare these dated entries to assess any subsequent changes or new observations. Maintain separate documentation for each source to enable ongoing review and context analysis of the domain’s recorded evidence.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Evidence layersAvailability: Content servingContent: Content served at rootDNS: ResolvedRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation内容在线Ordinary HTTP content served90%2026-10-11 10:00:42 UTC
RDAP registration未知
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-10-11 10:00:42 UTClast content: 2026-10-11 10:00:42 UTC
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
This timeline displays historical security and status checkpoints observed by the PhishDestroy automated monitoring network. It records domain lifecycle updates, scanner changes, and threat telemetry over time.
Threat First Observed2026-10-11 01:19:11 UTC
Domain ingestion complete. Initial state is marked as alive pointing to IP 23.252.79.177.
威胁响应 Pipeline
发现
Analysis
Notifications
Monitoring
9 recorded events. These records describe collected evidence, outgoing notifications and publication; they do not confirm a complete investigation or a takedown.
We scan suspicious URLs, inspect public results and send evidence through the appropriate abuse-reporting channels. The dated events above show what is recorded for this domain. The directory below explains the wider workflow.
01Public scans & evidence collection10 sources and tool groups+
Inspect the public DNS, TLS, HTTP and technology surface.
02Abuse reports & follow-upRegistrar, hosting and security channels+
Identify the responsible provider. Match registration and hosting records to the relevant abuse contact.
Prepare an evidence package. Include the URL, public scan references, captures and the recorded observations.
Send the report. Keep outgoing report records and recipient information when available.
Recheck and publish updates. Track later scanner verdicts, provider responses and site availability.
Security services used for scanning, reputation checks and reporting are listed below. A service being listed is not evidence that it received, accepted or acted on this particular domain. Recorded submissions appear in the notification history above.
PDF notice generated Notice text archived (856 chars)
Abuse notice text as sent to the provider
AUP & Terms of Service Violations:
Acceptable Use Policy: Active phishing operations targeting internet users directly violate standard AUP provisions prohibiting fraud and deceptive practices.
Terms of Service: Material breach of service terms regarding malicious use, providing contractual justification for immediate suspension.
Applicable Legal Framework (Unknown):
International Anti-Cybercrime Regulations
Budapest Convention on Cybercrime
Universal Fraud Prevention Laws
Phishing activities violate international cybercrime conventions and Unknown's domestic fraud laws.
Investigation Notice: We fully respect your internal investigation processes and discretion. Prompt remediation protects innocent users while mitigating regulatory compliance scrutiny, legal liability, and brand reputation risks associated with ongoing malicious infrastructure.
