The domain barkpath.shop was recorded by PhishDestroy on 2026-10-11 with an internal listing. The domain’s first appearance in monitoring systems is documented on the same date.
Recorded Evidence
PhishDestroy listed barkpath.shop internally on 2026-10-11. The domain resolved to IP address 162.222.90.224 in the US under AS199242 Malakmadze Web LLC on that date. The SSL certificate issuer was recorded as Let's Encrypt / YE2 on 2026-10-11.
Interpretation
PhishDestroy’s internal listing measures the domain’s inclusion in its catalogue on 2026-10-11. The SSL certificate record documents the technical configuration used by the domain on the same date.
Recommended Actions
Preserve the PhishDestroy internal listing and the SSL certificate record for barkpath.shop. Use these dated entries when conducting additional security checks or reviewing future observations.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Evidence layersAvailability: Content servingContent: Content served at rootDNS: ResolvedRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation内容在线Ordinary HTTP content served90%2026-10-11 10:00:30 UTC
RDAP registration未知
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-10-11 10:00:30 UTClast content: 2026-10-11 10:00:30 UTC
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
This timeline displays historical security and status checkpoints observed by the PhishDestroy automated monitoring network. It records domain lifecycle updates, scanner changes, and threat telemetry over time.
Threat First Observed2026-10-10 23:35:37 UTC
Domain ingestion complete. Initial state is marked as alive pointing to IP 162.222.90.224.
威胁响应 Pipeline
发现
Analysis
Notifications
Monitoring
10 recorded events. These records describe collected evidence, outgoing notifications and publication; they do not confirm a complete investigation or a takedown.
We scan suspicious URLs, inspect public results and send evidence through the appropriate abuse-reporting channels. The dated events above show what is recorded for this domain. The directory below explains the wider workflow.
01Public scans & evidence collection10 sources and tool groups+
Inspect the public DNS, TLS, HTTP and technology surface.
02Abuse reports & follow-upRegistrar, hosting and security channels+
Identify the responsible provider. Match registration and hosting records to the relevant abuse contact.
Prepare an evidence package. Include the URL, public scan references, captures and the recorded observations.
Send the report. Keep outgoing report records and recipient information when available.
Recheck and publish updates. Track later scanner verdicts, provider responses and site availability.
Security services used for scanning, reputation checks and reporting are listed below. A service being listed is not evidence that it received, accepted or acted on this particular domain. Recorded submissions appear in the notification history above.
PDF notice generated Notice text archived (856 chars)
Abuse notice text as sent to the provider
AUP & Terms of Service Violations:
Acceptable Use Policy: Active phishing operations targeting internet users directly violate standard AUP provisions prohibiting fraud and deceptive practices.
Terms of Service: Material breach of service terms regarding malicious use, providing contractual justification for immediate suspension.
Applicable Legal Framework (Unknown):
International Anti-Cybercrime Regulations
Budapest Convention on Cybercrime
Universal Fraud Prevention Laws
Phishing activities violate international cybercrime conventions and Unknown's domestic fraud laws.
Investigation Notice: We fully respect your internal investigation processes and discretion. Prompt remediation protects innocent users while mitigating regulatory compliance scrutiny, legal liability, and brand reputation risks associated with ongoing malicious infrastructure.
