VirusTotal
11 / 92
“Agapée | Jewelry | Agapee”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@rashost.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 16 days has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
agapeestudio.shop — 最后已知的活跃状态 (HTTP 200). 品牌冒充:Fakeshop; 诈骗类型:Impersonation. 证据摘要: VirusTotal 11/92 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, ESET, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet); URLScan malicious verdict; Spamhaus DBL_SPAM; PhishDestroy score 98/100.
为保留原始取证记录,下方的 PhishDestroy AI 详细分析仍使用英文。
agapeestudio.shop was recorded returning HTTP status 301 on 2026-10-01, a dated response observation from an HTTP check. The same domain also appears in the PhishDestroy internal listing, a publisher-owned catalogue entry.
On 2026-10-01, an HTTP check recorded status 301 for agapeestudio.shop. VirusTotal, checked on 2026-09-26, reported 8 detections across 91 scanners. OTX was checked on 2026-09-26 and showed 4 pulses. The PhishDestroy internal listing was recorded as present. An SSL scan on 2026-09-25 named YE2 as the certificate issuer. The domain was first observed on 2026-09-24.
The VirusTotal, OTX, and PhishDestroy records each describe separate source observations, and their differing dates mean they were not gathered at one moment. The HTTP 301 response applies only to the check performed on its recorded date rather than to every possible response from the domain. Reading the records side by side lets a reader compare what each source noted without merging their metrics into a single conclusion.
For agapeestudio.shop, preserve the PhishDestroy internal listing and the VirusTotal detection record as separate items for later review. Compare the OTX pulse entry and the HTTP check result on their own terms when tracking changes. Keep the SSL scan record available so future certificate observations can be compared against it. Retain the first-observed entry alongside these records to anchor the observation window.
针对该主机的爬虫与浏览器观察记录,以及针对“Keitaro”式流量分配系统的实时指纹检测。
扫描说明: alive_content: raw=ok; http=200; via=https_proxy
amos.ns.cloudflare.commillie.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
5f7b9ba5c846e1918c43c221a19d5e1ba32b624dc7fa4136e716a7921b18038bSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
195.96.131.106. 13 recorded events. These records describe collected evidence, outgoing notifications and publication; they do not confirm a complete investigation or a takedown.
We scan suspicious URLs, inspect public results and send evidence through the appropriate abuse-reporting channels. The dated events above show what is recorded for this domain. The directory below explains the wider workflow.
Capture the rendered page, requests and visible infrastructure.
Compare the available engine results and retain the analysis timestamp.
Check whether Google currently lists the URL as unsafe.
Inspect a public scan and its recorded network and classification data.
Look for indicator references and related community intelligence.
Compare archived captures and preserve historical context.
Look for matching indicators and associated threat records.
Inspect certificate records and related hostnames.
Compare security resolver responses and record observed blocking.
Inspect the public DNS, TLS, HTTP and technology surface.
Security services used for scanning, reputation checks and reporting are listed below. A service being listed is not evidence that it received, accepted or acted on this particular domain. Recorded submissions appear in the notification history above.
PD-20260924-72D61F Recipient: abuse@rashost.com Policy Violations: Illegal Activities: Active phishing operation targeting victims Fraud & Deception: Impersonation of legitimate services Identity Theft: Collection of credentials under false pretenses Applicable Laws (Unknown): International Anti-Cybercrime Regulations Budapest Convention on Cybercrime Universal Fraud Prevention Laws Phishing activities violate international cybercrime conventions and Unknown's domestic fraud laws. Action Required: This evidence-backed report demonstrates clear violations requiring suspension per your policies. Continued hosting exposes your organization to regulatory scrutiny and potential legal liability.
如果您输入了帐户凭据、个人或付款信息,或者从此域下载了文件,请立即采取措施。以下资源可帮助您报告事件并保护自己。
选择您所在的国家/地区以获取 官方网络犯罪联系人 或 创建投诉草稿 →。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent