Moteurs de sécurité signalant une détection : 8. Listes de blocage publiques signalant une correspondance : 2. Faites preuve d’une extrême prudence – ne saisissez pas d’informations d’identification ou d’informations personnelles.
Résumé du rapport
get-software.su — Contenu indisponible. Usurpation de l'identité de la marque : MetaMask; Type d'arnaque : Impersonation. Résumé des preuves: VirusTotal 8/89 (alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, G-Data, Gridinsoft); 2 external blocklist matches (MetaMask, SEAL); PhishDestroy score 95/100. Bureau d’enregistrement: REGRU-SU.
L’analyse détaillée de PhishDestroy AI reste en anglais afin de préserver le relevé forensique original.
Stored evidence for get-software.su: VirusTotal recorded 8 detections among 89 scanners on 2026-09-16. That ratio reproduces the stored check in its original units and is not converted into another measure. MetaMask and SEAL appear as named external blocklist observations for get-software.su. Each item in this report remains at the scope supplied by its dated source record.
Detection Evidence
VirusTotal records 8 detections among 89 scanners in the stored snapshot dated 2026-09-16. The numerator describes scanners that produced detections, while the denominator describes scanners included in that check. The reverse order would materially alter the stored result. The VirusTotal snapshot dated 2026-09-16 supplies no common rationale covering the included scanners, and this report adds none. A later VirusTotal snapshot may contain different values, so any comparison should preserve the exact ratio and date of each snapshot.
Source Context
MetaMask and SEAL are recorded as named external blocklist observations for get-software.su in the snapshot dated 2026-09-16. The stored MetaMask and SEAL blocklist records supply names and entries, but they supply no shared method or common rationale. PhishDestroy’s catalogue also contains get-software.su as a publisher record. That PhishDestroy record is counted separately from the MetaMask and SEAL external blocklist observations. This separation keeps the origin of every entry visible and prevents a single stored item from being counted again under another source label.
Reachability and Timeline
The record first observed get-software.su on 2026-09-14. The MetaMask and SEAL blocklist snapshot is dated 2026-09-16 and remains a separate event in the stored timeline. A stored HTTP status 301 was observed for get-software.su on 2026-09-16. The HTTP status 301 dated 2026-09-16 records a single response for later comparison. The registration date is separately recorded as 2026-09-13. A URLScan reference was stored on 2026-09-16 as a dated artifact for review. Each timestamp qualifies only the adjacent observation in this timeline. Later collection results should be compared with these dated values without replacing the earlier snapshot.
Registration and Infrastructure
For get-software.su, the registrar field records REGRU-SU; this is kept as an exact source value. The source stores 45.74.7.27 as the observed address in this record. The registration date for get-software.su is recorded as 2026-09-13. The SSL issuer is recorded as Let's Encrypt / YR2 in the snapshot dated 2026-09-14. The stored ASN observation records 202412 and Omegatech LTD in this record. The observed server header is recorded as Apache/2.4.52 (Ubuntu) in this record. These fields preserve registration, network, and certificate context stored in this record. The report preserves each label and number as a separate source value instead of combining them into an invented aggregate. Keeping the fields separate leaves every infrastructure value traceable to the record that supplied it.
Conclusion
The get-software.su record states that VirusTotal recorded 8 detections among 89 scanners on 2026-09-16. MetaMask and SEAL remain named blocklist observations from the snapshot dated 2026-09-16. PhishDestroy remains a separate publisher catalogue entry in the stored record. For get-software.su, the registrar field records REGRU-SU; this remains separate from the other source fields. The observed address field in this record contains 45.74.7.27. The supported conclusion is bounded to the exact stored observations for get-software.su. Any statement beyond those source values would require additional dated material.
Recommended Actions
Avoid submitting sensitive information to get-software.su during review. Use a known service address obtained separately from this report for any necessary access. Defenders can retain get-software.su as an exact indicator and preserve relevant DNS, proxy, and endpoint records. Compare later VirusTotal snapshots and MetaMask and SEAL blocklist records with the dated values above instead of replacing them. Keep each later observation with its source date so changes remain visible during follow-up review. If a defensive rule is needed, keep its scope to get-software.su. The stored record does not justify extending that rule to 45.74.7.27 or to other infrastructure records.
Analyse de la détection et de l'évasion
Vérification du cloaking et de la répartition du trafic
Pas encore numériséAucune différence entre les robots d'indexation et les navigateurs n'a encore été constatée
Enregistrement des observations « crawler contre navigateur » pour cet hôte, ainsi qu'une vérification en temps réel des empreintes numériques pour les systèmes de répartition du trafic de type Keitaro.
Indicateur de camouflage enregistré
Pas encore numérisé
Dernier scan de camouflage
Note relative à la numérisation:unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='get-software.su', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionError
Vérification en direct des empreintes digitales d'TDS
Sept empreintes Keitaro ainsi qu’une comparaison entre robot d’indexation et navigateur, générées par le scanner PhishDestroy lorsque ce panneau est ouvert.
EnregistrementCréé 13/09/2026 (28d · Very New!)—Expires 13/09/2027
Délai avant la première indisponibilité9h
Ce que nous comptons
Temps écoulé entre le premier rapport d'abus stocké et la première observation indiquant que le contenu n'était pas disponible. Cela n’établit pas la cause.
Ce que contient chaque rapport
Les enregistrements de rapports sortants stockés peuvent faire référence à des preuves disponibles à ce moment-là, telles que les verdicts des fournisseurs, les données d'enregistrement, les détails d'hébergement, les classifications ou les captures d'écran. Cette page ne déduit pas la charge utile exacte livrée, la réception, l'accusé de réception ou l'action d'un destinataire.
Détails techniquesProvenance & timestamps
Première détection14/09/2026
DOM Analysisanalyzed 14/09/2026score 95/1001 brand signal
Submitted URLhttp://get-software.su/
Favicon Hash
ID du dossier
Titre de la page
Security Check
Impersonates
MetaMask
Certificat TLS
Hostname coverage not recorded·
Émis par Let's Encrypt / YR2· stored validity ends in 61 days
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Primary outcomeDNS inactifreason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observationInconnuProbe Inconclusive20%2026-10-11 01:29:24 UTC
RDAP registrationInconnu
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-09-16 10:14:35 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-09-16 10:14:35 UTC → 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTC · 342.01hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-09-23 13:14:45 UTC · precision low · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
Technologies · 3 identified
U
Ubuntu
Operating systems
Ubuntu is a free and open-source operating system on Linux for the enterprise server, desktop, cloud, and IoT.
Last analyzed First positive detection Previous stored snapshot: 0 detections
alphaMountain.ai
CRDF
Forcepoint ThreatSeeker
G-Data
Gridinsoft
SOCRadar
Sophos
VIPRE
Analyse des performances du site
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of get-software.su· checked Sep 14, 2026
100
Good
Performance
FCP
0.76s
First Contentful Paint
LCP
0.76s
Largest Contentful Paint
CLS
0.001
Cumulative Layout Shift
TBT
0ms
Total Blocking Time
SI
1.39s
Speed Index
Powered by Google PageSpeed Insights · Mobile strategy · Scores: 90-100 Good50-89 Needs Work0-49 Poor
Forensic History & Detection Timeline
ThreatLifecycleTelemetry
This timeline displays historical security and status checkpoints observed by the PhishDestroy automated monitoring network. It records domain lifecycle updates, scanner changes, and threat telemetry over time.
Domain Status Transition2026-09-18 22:09:39 UTC
Domain state transitioned from alive to dead.
Domain Status Transition2026-09-15 22:17:58 UTC
Domain state transitioned from dead to alive.
Domain Status Transition2026-09-14 23:05:49 UTC
Domain state transitioned from alive to dead.
Threat First Observed2026-09-14 13:57:26 UTC
Domain ingestion complete. Initial state is marked as alive pointing to IP 45.74.7.27.
Processus de réponse aux menaces Pipeline
Découverte
Analysis
Notifications
Monitoring
15 recorded events. These records describe collected evidence, outgoing notifications and publication; they do not confirm a complete investigation or a takedown.
Menace détectée
get-software.su détectés et mis en file d'attente en vue d'une analyse complète
A stored Cloudflare Radar report is available. The report link alone is not a malicious verdict and does not prove that every network field was captured.
Les dernières vérifications stockées indiquent que le contenu signalé n'est pas disponible ; cela n’établit pas qui ou quoi a causé le changement.
19/09/2026
Délai avant la première indisponibilité
9 heures se sont écoulées entre la détection et la première observation indisponible.
How we investigate & report
Public scans, evidence and abuse channels
We scan suspicious URLs, inspect public results and send evidence through the appropriate abuse-reporting channels. The dated events above show what is recorded for this domain. The directory below explains the wider workflow.
01Public scans & evidence collection10 sources and tool groups+
Inspect the public DNS, TLS, HTTP and technology surface.
02Abuse reports & follow-upRegistrar, hosting and security channels+
Identify the responsible provider. Match registration and hosting records to the relevant abuse contact.
Prepare an evidence package. Include the URL, public scan references, captures and the recorded observations.
Send the report. Keep outgoing report records and recipient information when available.
Recheck and publish updates. Track later scanner verdicts, provider responses and site availability.
Security services used for scanning, reputation checks and reporting are listed below. A service being listed is not evidence that it received, accepted or acted on this particular domain. Recorded submissions appear in the notification history above.
PDF notice generated Notice text archived (650 chars)
Abuse notice text as sent to the provider
Policy Violations:
Illegal Activities: Active phishing operation targeting victims
Fraud & Deception: Impersonation of legitimate services
Identity Theft: Collection of credentials under false pretenses
Applicable Laws (Unknown):
International Anti-Cybercrime Regulations
Budapest Convention on Cybercrime
Universal Fraud Prevention Laws
Phishing activities violate international cybercrime conventions and Unknown's domestic fraud laws.
Action Required: This evidence-backed report demonstrates clear violations requiring suspension per your policies. Continued hosting exposes your organization to regulatory scrutiny and potential legal liability.
5 evidence signal groups linked1 reports recordedContenu indisponible
If credentials were compromised, report immediately. Do not engage with recovery scammers.
Si vous avez saisi des informations d'identification de compte, des informations personnelles ou de paiement, ou téléchargé un fichier à partir de ce domaine, agissez immédiatement. Vous trouverez ci-dessous des ressources pour vous aider à signaler l'incident et à vous protéger.
Méfiez-vous des escrocs qui prétendent vous aider à récupérer vos biens ! Les criminels peuvent recontacter leurs victimes tout en se faisant passer pour des enquêteurs, des avocats ou des agents de recouvrement. Ne payez pas de frais initiaux et ne partagez pas vos informations d'identification.En savoir plus sur la fraude liée aux aides à la reprise →
Signalez-le à vos autorités locales
Sélectionnez votre pays pour obtenir contacts officiels en matière de cybercriminalité ou créer un projet de plainte →.
Annuaire de 97 pays
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Brouillon assisté par l'IA : les détails de l'incident sont traités par le fournisseur d'IA · Examinez-le et soumettez-le vous-même
Infrastructure et rapports associés
Les relations stockées sont regroupées par attribut de correspondance exacte. Un fournisseur ou un registraire partagé ne prouve pas à lui seul la propriété commune.
Lien direct Partage un fichier d'enregistrement ou un kit de hameçonnage identique.
Signal auxiliaire Partage d'infrastructures ou de marque cible ; cela ne prouve pas qu'il s'agisse d'un seul et même opérateur.
Uniquement pour la découverte Répertorié à des fins de navigation ; aucun attribut commun avec cet hôte.
Carte des infrastructures · get-software.su
Chaque ligne correspond à une raison pour laquelle un domaine est associé à cet hébergeur. La taille des nœuds indique les détections de VirusTotal et les nœuds en pointillés sont déjà hors ligne. Les listes complètes figurent ci-dessous.
Le contenu correspond8
Même hachage de favicon ou même titre de page que cet hébergeur.
Enregistrés auprès du même bureau d'enregistrement. Un bureau d'enregistrement dessert des millions de clients sans lien entre eux ; ce regroupement constitue donc simplement un constat et ne prouve pas l'existence d'un lien.
