# PhishDestroy threat dossier — h110x.xyz
================================================================

Fetched:   2026-07-26 10:27:52 UTC
Canonical: https://phishdestroy.io/domain/h110x.xyz/

## VERDICT
----------------------------------------------------------------
HIGH THREAT — malicious activity confirmed
Composite threat score: 64/100 (PhishDestroy scoring — see methodology below)

## DETECTION EVIDENCE
----------------------------------------------------------------
VirusTotal:      4/91 security vendors flagged this domain
  Flagging vendors: alphaMountain.ai, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, LevelBlue
AlienVault OTX:  4 pulses (threat-intel feed mentions)
Public blocklists: listed on 1 independent blocklist

## INFRASTRUCTURE
----------------------------------------------------------------
Registrar:       Gname.com Pte. Ltd.
Nameservers:     ["ns1.1111343.com", "ns2.1111343.com", "ns3.1111343.com", "ns4.1111343.com"]
HTTP response:   200

## ABUSE-REPORT HISTORY (evidence of registrar non-response)
----------------------------------------------------------------
Status: pending notification queue. No abuse reports filed yet — this domain is
waiting for the next cycle of our automated abuse-reporter.

## TIMELINE
----------------------------------------------------------------
First detected:    2026-07-26 10:03:09 UTC (by PhishDestroy tracker)
Last verified:     2026-07-26 12:20:50 UTC
Current status:    ACTIVE / observable

## ANALYST NARRATIVE
----------------------------------------------------------------
[Generated: 2026-07-26 10:04:44 UTC — narrative may predate facts above. Treat fields in TIMELINE / DETECTION EVIDENCE / INFRASTRUCTURE as authoritative if they differ from the prose below.]

h110x.xyz — Phishing Site Detected

Analysis conducted on July 26, 2026 identifies h110x.xyz as an active generic phishing infrastructure. The domain is registered through Gname.com Pte. Ltd. and resolves to four authoritative name servers (ns1-1111343.com, ns2-1111343.com, ns3-1111343.com, ns4-1111343.com). HTTP requests receive a 200 OK response, confirming that a web service is presently reachable. The site appears on a single external security blocklist and is actively blocked by the PhishDestroy filtering service, indicating that at least one downstream provider has classified the content as malicious.

VirusTotal records show that four of ninety‑one scanned scanners have flagged the domain, providing independent vendor corroboration of suspicious behavior. No additional intelligence such as Safe Browsing matches, OTX references, or SSL certificate details were observed in the available data set. The limited evidence set prevents a full attribution of the hosting provider, IP address range, or geographical location. Likewise, the page title and any targeted brand information have not been disclosed, leaving the specific phishing lure undefined.

Nonetheless, the convergence of a positive blocklist entry, active PhishDestroy block, and multiple vendor detections establishes a high confidence that h110x.xyz is being used for credential‑harvesting or similar phishing campaigns. Defenders should block the domain at the DNS and proxy layers, include it in web‑filter deny lists, and monitor outbound connections for attempts to resolve or contact the four listed name servers. Continuous re‑scanning with multi‑engine services is advised to capture any evolution in the payload or additional detections. Organizations employing email filters should also add the domain to phishing rule sets to reduce user exposure.

## SCORING METHODOLOGY
----------------------------------------------------------------
Composite score is NOT derived from VirusTotal alone. PhishDestroy aggregates:
  - VirusTotal positive ratio
  - Public blocklist consensus (MetaMask, ScamSniffer, OpenPhish, PhishTank, URLhaus,
    CryptoFirewall, SEAL, Polkadot, Enkrypt, Phishunt, DiscordPhishing, PhishingDB)
  - Cloaking detection (HTTP 666 or rendering delta between bot and real visitor)
  - DNS-filter consensus (Quad9, CleanBrowsing, NextDNS, AdGuard, Cloudflare, etc.)
  - AlienVault OTX pulses + Cloudflare Radar + Google Safe Browsing
  - URLScan / URLQuery verdicts
  - Brand-impersonation heuristics (DOM analysis of forms, logos, wording)
  - Known phishing-kit fingerprinting (favicon hash, JS obfuscation signatures)
  - Wallet-drainer family classification (Angel, MS, Rainbow, Pink, Inferno, ...)
  - Free-TLS vs paid-cert ratio (throwaway infrastructure signal)
  - Registrar/hosting abuse history (this registrar's track record)
  - Human researcher sign-off (operator takedown team)

A domain present in our database is ALREADY flagged. A low VT count by itself does
NOT mean the domain is safe — new scam domains routinely show 0/95 VT for their
first 7–30 days while actively draining wallets. Always cross-reference the composite
score and the individual indicators above, not just VT.

## CORRECTIONS / APPEALS
----------------------------------------------------------------
Full HTML report:  https://phishdestroy.io/domain/h110x.xyz/
JSON API:          https://api.destroy.tools/v1/check?domain=h110x.xyz
Appeal a flag:     https://phishdestroy.io/appeals/  (responded to within 48 hours, FP rate <0.01%)
Submit a report:   https://t.me/PhishDestroy_bot

About PhishDestroy: independent open-source threat-intelligence platform.
Tracked: 196,605 domains (65,935 alive under monitoring, 129,120 confirmed takedowns/dead). Site: https://phishdestroy.io