# PhishDestroy threat dossier — greeconoimy.run ================================================================ Fetched: 2026-07-28 10:22:44 UTC Canonical: https://phishdestroy.io/domain/greeconoimy.run/ ## VERDICT ---------------------------------------------------------------- CRITICAL THREAT — DO NOT VISIT Composite threat score: 100/100 (PhishDestroy scoring — see methodology below) ## DETECTION EVIDENCE ---------------------------------------------------------------- VirusTotal: 16/91 security vendors flagged this domain Flagging vendors: ADMINUSLabs, alphaMountain.ai, AlphaSOC, BitDefender, Chong Lua Dao, ESET, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, G-Data, Gridinsoft, Kaspersky, Lionic, SOCRadar, Sophos, VIPRE, Webroot AlienVault OTX: 4 pulses (threat-intel feed mentions) Public blocklists: listed on 1 independent blocklist ## INFRASTRUCTURE ---------------------------------------------------------------- Registrar: MarkMonitor Inc. Nameservers: ["ns911b.microsoftinternetsafety.net", "ns911a.microsoftinternetsafety.net"] HTTP response: 302 ## ABUSE-REPORT HISTORY (evidence of registrar non-response) ---------------------------------------------------------------- Status: pending notification queue. No abuse reports filed yet — this domain is waiting for the next cycle of our automated abuse-reporter. ## TIMELINE ---------------------------------------------------------------- First detected: 2026-07-26 10:33:09 UTC (by PhishDestroy tracker) Last verified: 2026-07-28 12:20:32 UTC Current status: ACTIVE / observable ## ANALYST NARRATIVE ---------------------------------------------------------------- [Generated: 2026-07-26 10:34:32 UTC — narrative may predate facts above. Treat fields in TIMELINE / DETECTION EVIDENCE / INFRASTRUCTURE as authoritative if they differ from the prose below.] greeconoimy.run Generic Phishing Alert On 26 July 2026 analysts observed that the domain greeconoimy.run remains active and is associated with a generic phishing campaign. Registration information indicates the domain was created through MarkMonitor Inc., a registrar commonly used by legitimate enterprises, which may be an attempt to lend credibility to the malicious infrastructure. The domain resolves to two Microsoft‑associated nameservers, ns911a.microsoftinternetsafety.net and ns911b.microsoftinternetsafety.net, a pattern observed in other recent phishing operations that leverage compromised or hijacked DNS resources. HTTP requests to the host return a 302 redirect, suggesting the site forwards victims to a secondary location after initial contact. Threat‑intel feeds show that greeconoimy.run is listed on a single security blocklist and has been actively blocked by the PhishDestroy service, indicating that at least one defensive provider has identified malicious activity. VirusTotal analysis shows that 16 of 91 scanned security vendors flagged the domain as malicious, providing a modest but notable detection rate. The presence of multiple vendor detections, combined with the redirection behavior and the use of reputable‑sounding nameservers, increases confidence that the domain is being used to harvest credentials or other sensitive information. Current uncertainty includes the exact content served after the redirect, the target brand or service being spoofed, and the geographic location of the hosting infrastructure, as no IP address or ASN data were supplied. Because the site has not been publicly examined, defenders cannot confirm the precise phishing lure or payload. Nevertheless, the available indicators merit immediate defensive action. Security teams should add greeconoimy.run to block lists across firewalls, proxy servers, and endpoint web filters, and monitor DNS logs for any resolution attempts. ## SCORING METHODOLOGY ---------------------------------------------------------------- Composite score is NOT derived from VirusTotal alone. PhishDestroy aggregates: - VirusTotal positive ratio - Public blocklist consensus (MetaMask, ScamSniffer, OpenPhish, PhishTank, URLhaus, CryptoFirewall, SEAL, Polkadot, Enkrypt, Phishunt, DiscordPhishing, PhishingDB) - Cloaking detection (HTTP 666 or rendering delta between bot and real visitor) - DNS-filter consensus (Quad9, CleanBrowsing, NextDNS, AdGuard, Cloudflare, etc.) - AlienVault OTX pulses + Cloudflare Radar + Google Safe Browsing - URLScan / URLQuery verdicts - Brand-impersonation heuristics (DOM analysis of forms, logos, wording) - Known phishing-kit fingerprinting (favicon hash, JS obfuscation signatures) - Wallet-drainer family classification (Angel, MS, Rainbow, Pink, Inferno, ...) - Free-TLS vs paid-cert ratio (throwaway infrastructure signal) - Registrar/hosting abuse history (this registrar's track record) - Human researcher sign-off (operator takedown team) A domain present in our database is ALREADY flagged. A low VT count by itself does NOT mean the domain is safe — new scam domains routinely show 0/95 VT for their first 7–30 days while actively draining wallets. Always cross-reference the composite score and the individual indicators above, not just VT. ## CORRECTIONS / APPEALS ---------------------------------------------------------------- Full HTML report: https://phishdestroy.io/domain/greeconoimy.run/ JSON API: https://api.destroy.tools/v1/check?domain=greeconoimy.run Appeal a flag: https://phishdestroy.io/appeals/ (responded to within 48 hours, FP rate <0.01%) Submit a report: https://t.me/PhishDestroy_bot About PhishDestroy: independent open-source threat-intelligence platform. Tracked: 210,392 domains (93,543 alive under monitoring, 115,818 confirmed takedowns/dead). Site: https://phishdestroy.io