# PhishDestroy threat dossier — getupmodx.digital
================================================================

Fetched:   2026-07-28 05:28:21 UTC
Canonical: https://phishdestroy.io/domain/getupmodx.digital/

## VERDICT
----------------------------------------------------------------
CRITICAL THREAT — DO NOT VISIT
Composite threat score: 100/100 (PhishDestroy scoring — see methodology below)

## DETECTION EVIDENCE
----------------------------------------------------------------
VirusTotal:      20/91 security vendors flagged this domain
  Flagging vendors: ADMINUSLabs, alphaMountain.ai, AlphaSOC, BitDefender, Chong Lua Dao, CRDF, CyRadar, Dr.Web, ESET, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, G-Data, Gridinsoft, Kaspersky, LevelBlue, Lionic, SOCRadar, Sophos, VIPRE, Webroot
AlienVault OTX:  4 pulses (threat-intel feed mentions)
Public blocklists: listed on 1 independent blocklist

## INFRASTRUCTURE
----------------------------------------------------------------
Registrar:       MarkMonitor Inc.
Nameservers:     ["ns911b.microsoftinternetsafety.net", "ns911a.microsoftinternetsafety.net"]
HTTP response:   302

## ABUSE-REPORT HISTORY (evidence of registrar non-response)
----------------------------------------------------------------
Status: pending notification queue. No abuse reports filed yet — this domain is
waiting for the next cycle of our automated abuse-reporter.

## TIMELINE
----------------------------------------------------------------
First detected:    2026-07-26 08:23:08 UTC (by PhishDestroy tracker)
Last verified:     2026-07-28 04:20:52 UTC
Current status:    ACTIVE / observable

## ANALYST NARRATIVE
----------------------------------------------------------------
[Generated: 2026-07-26 08:24:49 UTC — narrative may predate facts above. Treat fields in TIMELINE / DETECTION EVIDENCE / INFRASTRUCTURE as authoritative if they differ from the prose below.]

getupmodx.digital: Confirmed Phishing Site

Analysis of the domain getupmodx.digital shows a high‑risk, active phishing infrastructure. The domain is registered through MarkMonitor Inc., a registrar commonly associated with legitimate brand protection services, but its use here is inconsistent with normal brand‑owner activity. DNS resolution points to the nameservers ns911b.microsoftinternetsafety.net and ns911a.microsoftinternetsafety.net, which appear to be generic hosting names rather than brand‑specific. An HTTP 302 response is observed, indicating that the site redirects visitors, a typical technique for funneling traffic to a malicious payload or credential‑harvesting page.

Threat intelligence platforms have flagged the domain: twenty of ninety‑one security vendors on VirusTotal have reported it as malicious, and it is listed on one public security blocklist. Additionally, PhishDestroy has explicitly blocked the domain, confirming its use in phishing campaigns. The risk rating is high and the status remains active, meaning the site continues to respond to requests.

While the precise phishing kit, target brand, or page content has not been disclosed in the available data, the combination of registrar, nameserver configuration, redirection behavior, and multi‑vendor detection provides strong evidence of a phishing operation. Defenders should add getupmodx.digital to URL filtering and DNS blocklists, monitor for any associated IP addresses or CNAME records, and consider notifying users of the threat. Continuous re‑assessment is advised, as further analysis of the landing page or observed traffic could reveal additional Indicators of Compromise.

## SCORING METHODOLOGY
----------------------------------------------------------------
Composite score is NOT derived from VirusTotal alone. PhishDestroy aggregates:
  - VirusTotal positive ratio
  - Public blocklist consensus (MetaMask, ScamSniffer, OpenPhish, PhishTank, URLhaus,
    CryptoFirewall, SEAL, Polkadot, Enkrypt, Phishunt, DiscordPhishing, PhishingDB)
  - Cloaking detection (HTTP 666 or rendering delta between bot and real visitor)
  - DNS-filter consensus (Quad9, CleanBrowsing, NextDNS, AdGuard, Cloudflare, etc.)
  - AlienVault OTX pulses + Cloudflare Radar + Google Safe Browsing
  - URLScan / URLQuery verdicts
  - Brand-impersonation heuristics (DOM analysis of forms, logos, wording)
  - Known phishing-kit fingerprinting (favicon hash, JS obfuscation signatures)
  - Wallet-drainer family classification (Angel, MS, Rainbow, Pink, Inferno, ...)
  - Free-TLS vs paid-cert ratio (throwaway infrastructure signal)
  - Registrar/hosting abuse history (this registrar's track record)
  - Human researcher sign-off (operator takedown team)

A domain present in our database is ALREADY flagged. A low VT count by itself does
NOT mean the domain is safe — new scam domains routinely show 0/95 VT for their
first 7–30 days while actively draining wallets. Always cross-reference the composite
score and the individual indicators above, not just VT.

## CORRECTIONS / APPEALS
----------------------------------------------------------------
Full HTML report:  https://phishdestroy.io/domain/getupmodx.digital/
JSON API:          https://api.destroy.tools/v1/check?domain=getupmodx.digital
Appeal a flag:     https://phishdestroy.io/appeals/  (responded to within 48 hours, FP rate <0.01%)
Submit a report:   https://t.me/PhishDestroy_bot

About PhishDestroy: independent open-source threat-intelligence platform.
Tracked: 209,465 domains (96,560 alive under monitoring, 111,874 confirmed takedowns/dead). Site: https://phishdestroy.io