# PhishDestroy threat dossier — furthert.run
================================================================

Fetched:   2026-07-28 09:34:06 UTC
Canonical: https://phishdestroy.io/domain/furthert.run/

## VERDICT
----------------------------------------------------------------
CRITICAL THREAT — DO NOT VISIT
Composite threat score: 100/100 (PhishDestroy scoring — see methodology below)

## DETECTION EVIDENCE
----------------------------------------------------------------
VirusTotal:      19/91 security vendors flagged this domain
  Flagging vendors: ADMINUSLabs, alphaMountain.ai, AlphaSOC, Antiy-AVL, BitDefender, Chong Lua Dao, CyRadar, Dr.Web, ESET, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, G-Data, Gridinsoft, Kaspersky, Lionic, SOCRadar, Sophos, VIPRE, Webroot
AlienVault OTX:  14 pulses (threat-intel feed mentions)
Public blocklists: listed on 1 independent blocklist

## INFRASTRUCTURE
----------------------------------------------------------------
Registrar:       MarkMonitor Inc.
Nameservers:     ["ns911b.microsoftinternetsafety.net", "ns911a.microsoftinternetsafety.net"]
HTTP response:   302

## ABUSE-REPORT HISTORY (evidence of registrar non-response)
----------------------------------------------------------------
Status: pending notification queue. No abuse reports filed yet — this domain is
waiting for the next cycle of our automated abuse-reporter.

## TIMELINE
----------------------------------------------------------------
First detected:    2026-07-26 08:23:08 UTC (by PhishDestroy tracker)
Last verified:     2026-07-28 08:20:26 UTC
Current status:    ACTIVE / observable

## ANALYST NARRATIVE
----------------------------------------------------------------
[Generated: 2026-07-26 08:24:35 UTC — narrative may predate facts above. Treat fields in TIMELINE / DETECTION EVIDENCE / INFRASTRUCTURE as authoritative if they differ from the prose below.]

Is furthert.run a Phishing Site?

The domain furthert.run was recorded on July 26, 2026 as part of an active generic phishing operation. Registration details indicate the domain was created through MarkMonitor Inc., a registrar frequently used by high‑profile brands, which may lend an initial appearance of legitimacy. authoritative name servers are listed as ns911a.microsoftinternetsafety.net and ns911b.microsoftinternetsafety.net; these hostnames reference Microsoft but do not correspond to known Microsoft infrastructure, suggesting possible subversion or misconfiguration. HTTP requests to the domain return a 302 status code, a behavior commonly employed to redirect browsers to credential‑harvesting pages without revealing the final destination in the initial response.

The domain is presently listed on one security blocklist and is actively blocked by the PhishDestroy mitigation service, confirming that at least one defensive platform has identified it as malicious. VirusTotal scanning shows that 19 of 91 security vendors have flagged the domain, providing multi‑engine corroboration of its malicious nature. No public information on IP address, autonomous system number, geographic location, SSL certificate, or page title is available, leaving those vectors unverified at this time.

Given the registrar affiliation, anomalous name server configuration, redirection behavior, blocklist presence, and vendor detections, the domain should be treated as hostile. Security teams are advised to add furthert.run to URL filtering and web proxy blocklists, incorporate it into endpoint detection and response signatures, and monitor DNS queries for related domains. Continuous re‑evaluation of VirusTotal results and any newly published intelligence will help determine if the threat posture evolves.

## SCORING METHODOLOGY
----------------------------------------------------------------
Composite score is NOT derived from VirusTotal alone. PhishDestroy aggregates:
  - VirusTotal positive ratio
  - Public blocklist consensus (MetaMask, ScamSniffer, OpenPhish, PhishTank, URLhaus,
    CryptoFirewall, SEAL, Polkadot, Enkrypt, Phishunt, DiscordPhishing, PhishingDB)
  - Cloaking detection (HTTP 666 or rendering delta between bot and real visitor)
  - DNS-filter consensus (Quad9, CleanBrowsing, NextDNS, AdGuard, Cloudflare, etc.)
  - AlienVault OTX pulses + Cloudflare Radar + Google Safe Browsing
  - URLScan / URLQuery verdicts
  - Brand-impersonation heuristics (DOM analysis of forms, logos, wording)
  - Known phishing-kit fingerprinting (favicon hash, JS obfuscation signatures)
  - Wallet-drainer family classification (Angel, MS, Rainbow, Pink, Inferno, ...)
  - Free-TLS vs paid-cert ratio (throwaway infrastructure signal)
  - Registrar/hosting abuse history (this registrar's track record)
  - Human researcher sign-off (operator takedown team)

A domain present in our database is ALREADY flagged. A low VT count by itself does
NOT mean the domain is safe — new scam domains routinely show 0/95 VT for their
first 7–30 days while actively draining wallets. Always cross-reference the composite
score and the individual indicators above, not just VT.

## CORRECTIONS / APPEALS
----------------------------------------------------------------
Full HTML report:  https://phishdestroy.io/domain/furthert.run/
JSON API:          https://api.destroy.tools/v1/check?domain=furthert.run
Appeal a flag:     https://phishdestroy.io/appeals/  (responded to within 48 hours, FP rate <0.01%)
Submit a report:   https://t.me/PhishDestroy_bot

About PhishDestroy: independent open-source threat-intelligence platform.
Tracked: 210,385 domains (97,480 alive under monitoring, 111,874 confirmed takedowns/dead). Site: https://phishdestroy.io