# PhishDestroy threat dossier — freshenqew.digital ================================================================ Fetched: 2026-07-29 12:14:18 UTC Canonical: https://phishdestroy.io/domain/freshenqew.digital/ ## VERDICT ---------------------------------------------------------------- CRITICAL THREAT — DO NOT VISIT Composite threat score: 100/100 (PhishDestroy scoring — see methodology below) ## DETECTION EVIDENCE ---------------------------------------------------------------- VirusTotal: 15/91 security vendors flagged this domain Flagging vendors: ADMINUSLabs, alphaMountain.ai, AlphaSOC, Antiy-AVL, BitDefender, Dr.Web, ESET, Fortinet, G-Data, Gridinsoft, Kaspersky, Lionic, Sophos, VIPRE, Webroot AlienVault OTX: 4 pulses (threat-intel feed mentions) Public blocklists: listed on 1 independent blocklist ## INFRASTRUCTURE ---------------------------------------------------------------- Registrar: MarkMonitor Inc. Nameservers: ["ns911b.microsoftinternetsafety.net", "ns911a.microsoftinternetsafety.net"] HTTP response: 302 ## ABUSE-REPORT HISTORY (evidence of registrar non-response) ---------------------------------------------------------------- Status: pending notification queue. No abuse reports filed yet — this domain is waiting for the next cycle of our automated abuse-reporter. ## TIMELINE ---------------------------------------------------------------- First detected: 2026-07-26 06:13:09 UTC (by PhishDestroy tracker) Last verified: 2026-07-29 12:20:34 UTC Current status: ACTIVE / observable ## ANALYST NARRATIVE ---------------------------------------------------------------- [Generated: 2026-07-26 06:14:30 UTC — narrative may predate facts above. Treat fields in TIMELINE / DETECTION EVIDENCE / INFRASTRUCTURE as authoritative if they differ from the prose below.] freshenqew.digital: Confirmed Phishing Site freshenqew.digital is currently listed as an active generic phishing infrastructure. The domain resolves to the authoritative name servers ns911b.microsoftinternetsafety.net and ns911a.microsoftinternetsafety.net, both of which are observable in public DNS records. Registration data shows the domain was purchased through MarkMonitor Inc., a registrar frequently used by legitimate enterprises, indicating possible abuse of a compromised or stolen account. HTTP probing returns a 302 redirect, a common technique for funneling victims to credential‑collection pages or for evading simple URL filters. Multiple defensive feeds have identified the domain. PhishDestroy has placed it on its blocklist, and it appears on an additional independent blocklist, resulting in a total of one known blocklist inclusion at the time of analysis. VirusTotal analysis shows that 15 of 91 scanned security vendors flag the domain as malicious, reinforcing the suspicion of phishing activity despite the modest detection ratio. The domain’s risk rating is classified as high, and its status remains active, indicating that the infrastructure is still serving malicious content. Open questions remain regarding the specific payload hosted behind the redirect, the target brand or service being spoofed, and the IP address or hosting provider used for the web server, as these details were not captured in the available intelligence. Analysts should continue to monitor DNS resolution changes, request additional sandbox or page‑title analysis, and consider adding the domain to local deny lists. Network defenders are advised to block outbound connections to the domain, update intrusion‑prevention signatures, and alert incident response teams if any user traffic or credential submission attempts to freshenqew.digital are observed. ## SCORING METHODOLOGY ---------------------------------------------------------------- Composite score is NOT derived from VirusTotal alone. PhishDestroy aggregates: - VirusTotal positive ratio - Public blocklist consensus (MetaMask, ScamSniffer, OpenPhish, PhishTank, URLhaus, CryptoFirewall, SEAL, Polkadot, Enkrypt, Phishunt, DiscordPhishing, PhishingDB) - Cloaking detection (HTTP 666 or rendering delta between bot and real visitor) - DNS-filter consensus (Quad9, CleanBrowsing, NextDNS, AdGuard, Cloudflare, etc.) - AlienVault OTX pulses + Cloudflare Radar + Google Safe Browsing - URLScan / URLQuery verdicts - Brand-impersonation heuristics (DOM analysis of forms, logos, wording) - Known phishing-kit fingerprinting (favicon hash, JS obfuscation signatures) - Wallet-drainer family classification (Angel, MS, Rainbow, Pink, Inferno, ...) - Free-TLS vs paid-cert ratio (throwaway infrastructure signal) - Registrar/hosting abuse history (this registrar's track record) - Human researcher sign-off (operator takedown team) A domain present in our database is ALREADY flagged. A low VT count by itself does NOT mean the domain is safe — new scam domains routinely show 0/95 VT for their first 7–30 days while actively draining wallets. Always cross-reference the composite score and the individual indicators above, not just VT. ## CORRECTIONS / APPEALS ---------------------------------------------------------------- Full HTML report: https://phishdestroy.io/domain/freshenqew.digital/ JSON API: https://api.destroy.tools/v1/check?domain=freshenqew.digital Appeal a flag: https://phishdestroy.io/appeals/ (responded to within 48 hours, FP rate <0.01%) Submit a report: https://t.me/PhishDestroy_bot About PhishDestroy: independent open-source threat-intelligence platform. Tracked: 195,406 domains (83,153 alive under monitoring, 109,651 confirmed takedowns/dead). Site: https://phishdestroy.io