# PhishDestroy threat dossier — forgeitu.live ================================================================ Fetched: 2026-07-28 09:30:48 UTC Canonical: https://phishdestroy.io/domain/forgeitu.live/ ## VERDICT ---------------------------------------------------------------- CRITICAL THREAT — DO NOT VISIT Composite threat score: 100/100 (PhishDestroy scoring — see methodology below) ## DETECTION EVIDENCE ---------------------------------------------------------------- VirusTotal: 17/91 security vendors flagged this domain Flagging vendors: ADMINUSLabs, alphaMountain.ai, AlphaSOC, BitDefender, Chong Lua Dao, CyRadar, ESET, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, G-Data, Gridinsoft, Kaspersky, Lionic, SOCRadar, Sophos, VIPRE, Webroot AlienVault OTX: 2 pulses (threat-intel feed mentions) Public blocklists: listed on 1 independent blocklist ## INFRASTRUCTURE ---------------------------------------------------------------- Registrar: MarkMonitor Inc. Nameservers: ["ns911b.microsoftinternetsafety.net", "ns911a.microsoftinternetsafety.net"] HTTP response: 302 ## ABUSE-REPORT HISTORY (evidence of registrar non-response) ---------------------------------------------------------------- Status: pending notification queue. No abuse reports filed yet — this domain is waiting for the next cycle of our automated abuse-reporter. ## TIMELINE ---------------------------------------------------------------- First detected: 2026-07-26 06:13:09 UTC (by PhishDestroy tracker) Last verified: 2026-07-28 08:20:27 UTC Current status: ACTIVE / observable ## ANALYST NARRATIVE ---------------------------------------------------------------- [Generated: 2026-07-26 06:14:35 UTC — narrative may predate facts above. Treat fields in TIMELINE / DETECTION EVIDENCE / INFRASTRUCTURE as authoritative if they differ from the prose below.] forgeitu.live Phishing Alert forgeitu.live is currently registered through MarkMonitor Inc. The domain resolves to Microsoft‑operated nameservers ns911a.microsoftinternetsafety.net and ns911b.microsoftinternetsafety.net, indicating that the attacker has leveraged reputable DNS infrastructure to increase perceived legitimacy. As of the report date, July 26 2026, the domain remains active and returns an HTTP 302 redirect, a pattern often used to forward victims to malicious payloads after initial contact. VirusTotal analysis shows that 17 of 91 scanned security vendors flag the domain as malicious, providing a moderate consensus of compromise. The domain appears on a single public blocklist and is actively blocked by the PhishDestroy service, confirming that at least one anti‑phishing feed has identified it as a threat. No additional intelligence such as hosting IP, ASN, or SSL certificate details are available in the current dataset, leaving the underlying hosting environment uncharacterized. The lack of a disclosed brand target or page title means the exact impersonation vector cannot be confirmed at this time. Defenders should continue to monitor the domain, enforce existing blocklist entries, and consider adding it to internal URL filtering policies. Network sensors should be configured to log any HTTP 302 responses from this host, and security appliances that ingest VirusTotal reputation should treat the 17‑vendor detection as an indicator of compromise. Incident response teams should also verify whether any internal users have interacted with the redirect chain, and if so, initiate standard credential‑reset and malware‑remediation procedures. Ongoing intelligence collection, including passive DNS and SSL certificate monitoring, is recommended to capture any future changes to the domain’s infrastructure. ## SCORING METHODOLOGY ---------------------------------------------------------------- Composite score is NOT derived from VirusTotal alone. PhishDestroy aggregates: - VirusTotal positive ratio - Public blocklist consensus (MetaMask, ScamSniffer, OpenPhish, PhishTank, URLhaus, CryptoFirewall, SEAL, Polkadot, Enkrypt, Phishunt, DiscordPhishing, PhishingDB) - Cloaking detection (HTTP 666 or rendering delta between bot and real visitor) - DNS-filter consensus (Quad9, CleanBrowsing, NextDNS, AdGuard, Cloudflare, etc.) - AlienVault OTX pulses + Cloudflare Radar + Google Safe Browsing - URLScan / URLQuery verdicts - Brand-impersonation heuristics (DOM analysis of forms, logos, wording) - Known phishing-kit fingerprinting (favicon hash, JS obfuscation signatures) - Wallet-drainer family classification (Angel, MS, Rainbow, Pink, Inferno, ...) - Free-TLS vs paid-cert ratio (throwaway infrastructure signal) - Registrar/hosting abuse history (this registrar's track record) - Human researcher sign-off (operator takedown team) A domain present in our database is ALREADY flagged. A low VT count by itself does NOT mean the domain is safe — new scam domains routinely show 0/95 VT for their first 7–30 days while actively draining wallets. Always cross-reference the composite score and the individual indicators above, not just VT. ## CORRECTIONS / APPEALS ---------------------------------------------------------------- Full HTML report: https://phishdestroy.io/domain/forgeitu.live/ JSON API: https://api.destroy.tools/v1/check?domain=forgeitu.live Appeal a flag: https://phishdestroy.io/appeals/ (responded to within 48 hours, FP rate <0.01%) Submit a report: https://t.me/PhishDestroy_bot About PhishDestroy: independent open-source threat-intelligence platform. Tracked: 210,385 domains (97,480 alive under monitoring, 111,874 confirmed takedowns/dead). Site: https://phishdestroy.io