# PhishDestroy threat dossier — flushelett.digital
================================================================

Fetched:   2026-07-28 09:31:29 UTC
Canonical: https://phishdestroy.io/domain/flushelett.digital/

## VERDICT
----------------------------------------------------------------
CRITICAL THREAT — DO NOT VISIT
Composite threat score: 100/100 (PhishDestroy scoring — see methodology below)

## DETECTION EVIDENCE
----------------------------------------------------------------
VirusTotal:      18/91 security vendors flagged this domain
  Flagging vendors: ADMINUSLabs, alphaMountain.ai, AlphaSOC, BitDefender, Chong Lua Dao, CyRadar, ESET, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, G-Data, Gridinsoft, Kaspersky, LevelBlue, Lionic, SOCRadar, Sophos, VIPRE, Webroot
AlienVault OTX:  4 pulses (threat-intel feed mentions)
Public blocklists: listed on 1 independent blocklist

## INFRASTRUCTURE
----------------------------------------------------------------
Registrar:       MarkMonitor Inc.
Nameservers:     ["ns911b.microsoftinternetsafety.net", "ns911a.microsoftinternetsafety.net"]
HTTP response:   302

## ABUSE-REPORT HISTORY (evidence of registrar non-response)
----------------------------------------------------------------
Status: pending notification queue. No abuse reports filed yet — this domain is
waiting for the next cycle of our automated abuse-reporter.

## TIMELINE
----------------------------------------------------------------
First detected:    2026-07-26 06:13:09 UTC (by PhishDestroy tracker)
Last verified:     2026-07-28 08:20:27 UTC
Current status:    ACTIVE / observable

## ANALYST NARRATIVE
----------------------------------------------------------------
[Generated: 2026-07-26 06:14:40 UTC — narrative may predate facts above. Treat fields in TIMELINE / DETECTION EVIDENCE / INFRASTRUCTURE as authoritative if they differ from the prose below.]

flushelett.digital leveraged in high‑risk generic phishing

The domain flushelett.digital was registered via MarkMonitor Inc., a registrar commonly associated with legitimate enterprises, which can obscure malicious intent. VirusTotal records show that 18 out of 91 scanned security engines flagged the domain, indicating a moderate to high likelihood of malicious behavior. The site currently returns an HTTP 302 redirect, a technique frequently used to forward victims to credential‑harvesting pages or to hide the final landing location. External threat‑intelligence feeds have added the domain to at least one blocklist and PhishDestroy has actively blocked it, reinforcing the assessment of a high‑risk phishing operation.

Nameserver lookups reveal the domain is delegated to ns911a.microsoftinternetsafety.net and ns911b.microsoftinternetsafety.net, infrastructure that appears to be shared with other abusive domains and may be leveraged to provide a veneer of legitimacy. The domain remains active as of the report date, and no additional public evidence such as SSL certificate details, hosting IP, or page title has been published. Uncertainties remain because the landing page has not been captured, the target brand or credential fields are unknown, and the underlying hosting provider has not been disclosed. Consequently, the full scope of the campaign—whether it targets specific services or employs a broader credential‑stealing kit—cannot be determined at this time.

Defenders should immediately add flushelett.digital to web‑filter deny lists and ensure that DNS resolvers block queries to the associated nameservers. Monitoring for outbound connections to the resolved IP addresses, as well as continuous VirusTotal and blocklist re‑scans, will help detect any changes in the domain’s behavior. Organizations using email gateways should treat any communications that reference flushelett.digital as malicious and quarantine them.

## SCORING METHODOLOGY
----------------------------------------------------------------
Composite score is NOT derived from VirusTotal alone. PhishDestroy aggregates:
  - VirusTotal positive ratio
  - Public blocklist consensus (MetaMask, ScamSniffer, OpenPhish, PhishTank, URLhaus,
    CryptoFirewall, SEAL, Polkadot, Enkrypt, Phishunt, DiscordPhishing, PhishingDB)
  - Cloaking detection (HTTP 666 or rendering delta between bot and real visitor)
  - DNS-filter consensus (Quad9, CleanBrowsing, NextDNS, AdGuard, Cloudflare, etc.)
  - AlienVault OTX pulses + Cloudflare Radar + Google Safe Browsing
  - URLScan / URLQuery verdicts
  - Brand-impersonation heuristics (DOM analysis of forms, logos, wording)
  - Known phishing-kit fingerprinting (favicon hash, JS obfuscation signatures)
  - Wallet-drainer family classification (Angel, MS, Rainbow, Pink, Inferno, ...)
  - Free-TLS vs paid-cert ratio (throwaway infrastructure signal)
  - Registrar/hosting abuse history (this registrar's track record)
  - Human researcher sign-off (operator takedown team)

A domain present in our database is ALREADY flagged. A low VT count by itself does
NOT mean the domain is safe — new scam domains routinely show 0/95 VT for their
first 7–30 days while actively draining wallets. Always cross-reference the composite
score and the individual indicators above, not just VT.

## CORRECTIONS / APPEALS
----------------------------------------------------------------
Full HTML report:  https://phishdestroy.io/domain/flushelett.digital/
JSON API:          https://api.destroy.tools/v1/check?domain=flushelett.digital
Appeal a flag:     https://phishdestroy.io/appeals/  (responded to within 48 hours, FP rate <0.01%)
Submit a report:   https://t.me/PhishDestroy_bot

About PhishDestroy: independent open-source threat-intelligence platform.
Tracked: 210,385 domains (97,480 alive under monitoring, 111,874 confirmed takedowns/dead). Site: https://phishdestroy.io