# PhishDestroy threat dossier — flamingof.run ================================================================ Fetched: 2026-07-28 08:45:02 UTC Canonical: https://phishdestroy.io/domain/flamingof.run/ ## VERDICT ---------------------------------------------------------------- CRITICAL THREAT — DO NOT VISIT Composite threat score: 100/100 (PhishDestroy scoring — see methodology below) ## DETECTION EVIDENCE ---------------------------------------------------------------- VirusTotal: 19/91 security vendors flagged this domain Flagging vendors: ADMINUSLabs, alphaMountain.ai, AlphaSOC, Antiy-AVL, BitDefender, Chong Lua Dao, CyRadar, Dr.Web, ESET, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, G-Data, Gridinsoft, Kaspersky, Lionic, SOCRadar, Sophos, VIPRE, Webroot AlienVault OTX: 2 pulses (threat-intel feed mentions) Public blocklists: listed on 1 independent blocklist ## INFRASTRUCTURE ---------------------------------------------------------------- Registrar: MarkMonitor Inc. Nameservers: ["ns911b.microsoftinternetsafety.net", "ns911a.microsoftinternetsafety.net"] HTTP response: 302 ## ABUSE-REPORT HISTORY (evidence of registrar non-response) ---------------------------------------------------------------- Status: pending notification queue. No abuse reports filed yet — this domain is waiting for the next cycle of our automated abuse-reporter. ## TIMELINE ---------------------------------------------------------------- First detected: 2026-07-26 06:13:09 UTC (by PhishDestroy tracker) Last verified: 2026-07-28 08:20:27 UTC Current status: ACTIVE / observable ## ANALYST NARRATIVE ---------------------------------------------------------------- [Generated: 2026-07-26 06:14:44 UTC — narrative may predate facts above. Treat fields in TIMELINE / DETECTION EVIDENCE / INFRASTRUCTURE as authoritative if they differ from the prose below.] flamingof.run Safety Check — Phishing Detected The domain flamingof.run is currently active and has been classified as a generic phishing infrastructure. Registrar data shows that the domain was registered through MarkMonitor Inc., a provider commonly associated with legitimate brand protection services, indicating that the threat actor may have leveraged a reputable registrar to increase perceived legitimacy. DNS resolution is delegated to the nameservers ns911a.microsoftinternetsafety.net and ns911b.microsoftinternetsafety.net, which appear to be generic hosting names rather than brand‑specific. The site returns an HTTP 302 redirect, a response often used by phishing operators to funnel victims to credential‑harvesting pages or to mask the final destination. VirusTotal analysis records 19 out of 91 security‑vendor detections flagging the domain, reinforcing the suspicion of malicious intent. The domain is listed on a single security blocklist and has been actively blocked by the PhishDestroy service, demonstrating that external threat‑intelligence feeds have recognized it as a hostile resource. Although the exact malicious payload, page title, and SSL certificate details are not presently disclosed, the convergence of registrar choice, redirection behavior, vendor detections, and blocklist presence provides a high‑confidence indication of phishing activity. Defenders should immediately add flamingof.run to their deny‑list rulesets, monitor DNS queries for the associated nameservers, and ensure that proxy or web‑filter solutions are configured to block the domain. Continuous re‑evaluation is advised, as additional indicators such as IP address attribution or SSL fingerprint may emerge in future scans. ## SCORING METHODOLOGY ---------------------------------------------------------------- Composite score is NOT derived from VirusTotal alone. PhishDestroy aggregates: - VirusTotal positive ratio - Public blocklist consensus (MetaMask, ScamSniffer, OpenPhish, PhishTank, URLhaus, CryptoFirewall, SEAL, Polkadot, Enkrypt, Phishunt, DiscordPhishing, PhishingDB) - Cloaking detection (HTTP 666 or rendering delta between bot and real visitor) - DNS-filter consensus (Quad9, CleanBrowsing, NextDNS, AdGuard, Cloudflare, etc.) - AlienVault OTX pulses + Cloudflare Radar + Google Safe Browsing - URLScan / URLQuery verdicts - Brand-impersonation heuristics (DOM analysis of forms, logos, wording) - Known phishing-kit fingerprinting (favicon hash, JS obfuscation signatures) - Wallet-drainer family classification (Angel, MS, Rainbow, Pink, Inferno, ...) - Free-TLS vs paid-cert ratio (throwaway infrastructure signal) - Registrar/hosting abuse history (this registrar's track record) - Human researcher sign-off (operator takedown team) A domain present in our database is ALREADY flagged. A low VT count by itself does NOT mean the domain is safe — new scam domains routinely show 0/95 VT for their first 7–30 days while actively draining wallets. Always cross-reference the composite score and the individual indicators above, not just VT. ## CORRECTIONS / APPEALS ---------------------------------------------------------------- Full HTML report: https://phishdestroy.io/domain/flamingof.run/ JSON API: https://api.destroy.tools/v1/check?domain=flamingof.run Appeal a flag: https://phishdestroy.io/appeals/ (responded to within 48 hours, FP rate <0.01%) Submit a report: https://t.me/PhishDestroy_bot About PhishDestroy: independent open-source threat-intelligence platform. Tracked: 210,284 domains (97,379 alive under monitoring, 111,874 confirmed takedowns/dead). Site: https://phishdestroy.io