# PhishDestroy threat dossier — fishgh.digital ================================================================ Fetched: 2026-07-28 08:45:01 UTC Canonical: https://phishdestroy.io/domain/fishgh.digital/ ## VERDICT ---------------------------------------------------------------- CRITICAL THREAT — DO NOT VISIT Composite threat score: 100/100 (PhishDestroy scoring — see methodology below) ## DETECTION EVIDENCE ---------------------------------------------------------------- VirusTotal: 19/91 security vendors flagged this domain Flagging vendors: ADMINUSLabs, alphaMountain.ai, AlphaSOC, Antiy-AVL, BitDefender, Chong Lua Dao, CyRadar, Dr.Web, ESET, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, G-Data, Gridinsoft, Kaspersky, Lionic, SOCRadar, Sophos, VIPRE, Webroot AlienVault OTX: 38 pulses (threat-intel feed mentions) Public blocklists: listed on 1 independent blocklist ## INFRASTRUCTURE ---------------------------------------------------------------- Registrar: MarkMonitor Inc. Nameservers: ["ns911b.microsoftinternetsafety.net", "ns911a.microsoftinternetsafety.net"] HTTP response: 302 ## ABUSE-REPORT HISTORY (evidence of registrar non-response) ---------------------------------------------------------------- Status: pending notification queue. No abuse reports filed yet — this domain is waiting for the next cycle of our automated abuse-reporter. ## TIMELINE ---------------------------------------------------------------- First detected: 2026-07-26 06:13:09 UTC (by PhishDestroy tracker) Last verified: 2026-07-28 08:20:27 UTC Current status: ACTIVE / observable ## ANALYST NARRATIVE ---------------------------------------------------------------- [Generated: 2026-07-26 06:14:45 UTC — narrative may predate facts above. Treat fields in TIMELINE / DETECTION EVIDENCE / INFRASTRUCTURE as authoritative if they differ from the prose below.] fishgh.digital Generic Phishing Alert The domain fishgh.digital was observed on July 26, 2026 and is currently classified as a high‑risk generic phishing site. Infrastructure analysis shows the domain is delegated to the nameservers ns911b.microsoftinternetsafety.net and ns911a.microsoftinternetsafety.net, both of which are associated with Microsoft‑owned DNS infrastructure, indicating that the attackers may be leveraging legitimate DNS resources to improve credibility. An HTTP request to the domain returns a 302 status code, suggesting that visitors are immediately redirected to another location, a technique commonly used to obscure the ultimate malicious payload or credential‑harvesting page. VirusTotal scans report that 19 of 91 security vendors flag the domain as malicious, providing a moderate consensus of malicious intent across independent detection engines. The domain appears on a single external security blocklist and is specifically listed as blocked by the PhishDestroy feed, reinforcing its presence in threat‑intelligence repositories. Registration details reveal that the domain was registered through MarkMonitor Inc., a registrar frequently used by legitimate enterprises, which may complicate attribution and highlights the importance of registrar‑level vigilance. No additional data such as IP address, autonomous system number, geographic location, or SSL certificate information is available from the current intelligence set. The domain remains active at the time of reporting, indicating that the phishing campaign is ongoing. Defensive recommendations include adding fishgh.digital to network denylists, configuring DNS sinkhole rules to intercept queries, and applying web‑filter policies that block HTTP redirects originating from the domain. ## SCORING METHODOLOGY ---------------------------------------------------------------- Composite score is NOT derived from VirusTotal alone. PhishDestroy aggregates: - VirusTotal positive ratio - Public blocklist consensus (MetaMask, ScamSniffer, OpenPhish, PhishTank, URLhaus, CryptoFirewall, SEAL, Polkadot, Enkrypt, Phishunt, DiscordPhishing, PhishingDB) - Cloaking detection (HTTP 666 or rendering delta between bot and real visitor) - DNS-filter consensus (Quad9, CleanBrowsing, NextDNS, AdGuard, Cloudflare, etc.) - AlienVault OTX pulses + Cloudflare Radar + Google Safe Browsing - URLScan / URLQuery verdicts - Brand-impersonation heuristics (DOM analysis of forms, logos, wording) - Known phishing-kit fingerprinting (favicon hash, JS obfuscation signatures) - Wallet-drainer family classification (Angel, MS, Rainbow, Pink, Inferno, ...) - Free-TLS vs paid-cert ratio (throwaway infrastructure signal) - Registrar/hosting abuse history (this registrar's track record) - Human researcher sign-off (operator takedown team) A domain present in our database is ALREADY flagged. A low VT count by itself does NOT mean the domain is safe — new scam domains routinely show 0/95 VT for their first 7–30 days while actively draining wallets. Always cross-reference the composite score and the individual indicators above, not just VT. ## CORRECTIONS / APPEALS ---------------------------------------------------------------- Full HTML report: https://phishdestroy.io/domain/fishgh.digital/ JSON API: https://api.destroy.tools/v1/check?domain=fishgh.digital Appeal a flag: https://phishdestroy.io/appeals/ (responded to within 48 hours, FP rate <0.01%) Submit a report: https://t.me/PhishDestroy_bot About PhishDestroy: independent open-source threat-intelligence platform. Tracked: 210,284 domains (97,379 alive under monitoring, 111,874 confirmed takedowns/dead). Site: https://phishdestroy.io