# PhishDestroy threat dossier — api.injuries.to ================================================================ Fetched: 2026-07-21 11:20:39 UTC Canonical: https://phishdestroy.io/domain/api.injuries.to/ ## VERDICT ---------------------------------------------------------------- TAKEN DOWN (neutralised) Composite threat score: 46/100 (PhishDestroy scoring — see methodology below) ## DETECTION EVIDENCE ---------------------------------------------------------------- VirusTotal: 1/91 security vendors flagged this domain Flagging vendors: SOCRadar Public blocklists: listed on 1 independent blocklist ## INFRASTRUCTURE ---------------------------------------------------------------- Registrar: Government of Kingdom of Tonga Nameservers: ["keira.ns.cloudflare.com", "lloyd.ns.cloudflare.com"] HTTP response: 404 ## ABUSE-REPORT HISTORY (evidence of registrar non-response) ---------------------------------------------------------------- Status: CLOSED — no report required. This domain was neutralised before the abuse-report cycle could be dispatched — either the hosting provider / registrar suspended it on their own, the DNS went dead, or the operator abandoned the infrastructure. PhishDestroy keeps the evidence bundle on file for audit but no formal notice was sent. ## TIMELINE ---------------------------------------------------------------- First detected: 2026-07-19 13:00:16 UTC (by PhishDestroy tracker) Last verified: 2026-07-21 12:20:25 UTC Neutralised: 2026-07-20 00:25:39 UTC Current status: taken down (registrar suspended or DNS dead) ## ANALYST NARRATIVE ---------------------------------------------------------------- [Generated: 2026-07-19 21:05:43 UTC — narrative may predate facts above. Treat fields in TIMELINE / DETECTION EVIDENCE / INFRASTRUCTURE as authoritative if they differ from the prose below.] api.injuries.to — Phishing Investigation Report The domain api.injuries.to is classified as an active generic phishing site with a high risk rating. Infrastructure analysis shows the site returns an HTTP 308 status code, indicating a permanent redirect that may be used to funnel victims to a malicious landing page. The domain has been blocked by the PhishDestroy mitigation service and is listed on one external security blocklist, confirming that at least one trusted feed considers it malicious. A VirusTotal scan returned a single positive detection out of 91 security vendors, demonstrating that the threat is recognized by at least one scanning engine but has not yet achieved broad consensus. No additional contextual data such as page title, brand targeting, or malware kit is available, so the exact content and attack vector remain uncertain. Defenders should treat the domain as hostile: block it at the DNS and firewall layers, add it to intrusion‑detection signatures, and monitor for outbound connections that may indicate compromised hosts attempting to contact the redirect endpoint. Continuous re‑evaluation is advised, as further analysis or additional vendor detections could change the threat posture. ## SCORING METHODOLOGY ---------------------------------------------------------------- Composite score is NOT derived from VirusTotal alone. PhishDestroy aggregates: - VirusTotal positive ratio - Public blocklist consensus (MetaMask, ScamSniffer, OpenPhish, PhishTank, URLhaus, CryptoFirewall, SEAL, Polkadot, Enkrypt, Phishunt, DiscordPhishing, PhishingDB) - Cloaking detection (HTTP 666 or rendering delta between bot and real visitor) - DNS-filter consensus (Quad9, CleanBrowsing, NextDNS, AdGuard, Cloudflare, etc.) - AlienVault OTX pulses + Cloudflare Radar + Google Safe Browsing - URLScan / URLQuery verdicts - Brand-impersonation heuristics (DOM analysis of forms, logos, wording) - Known phishing-kit fingerprinting (favicon hash, JS obfuscation signatures) - Wallet-drainer family classification (Angel, MS, Rainbow, Pink, Inferno, ...) - Free-TLS vs paid-cert ratio (throwaway infrastructure signal) - Registrar/hosting abuse history (this registrar's track record) - Human researcher sign-off (operator takedown team) A domain present in our database is ALREADY flagged. A low VT count by itself does NOT mean the domain is safe — new scam domains routinely show 0/95 VT for their first 7–30 days while actively draining wallets. Always cross-reference the composite score and the individual indicators above, not just VT. ## CORRECTIONS / APPEALS ---------------------------------------------------------------- Full HTML report: https://phishdestroy.io/domain/api.injuries.to/ JSON API: https://api.destroy.tools/v1/check?domain=api.injuries.to Appeal a flag: https://phishdestroy.io/appeals/ (responded to within 48 hours, FP rate <0.01%) Submit a report: https://t.me/PhishDestroy_bot About PhishDestroy: independent open-source threat-intelligence platform. Tracked: 187,516 domains (57,259 alive under monitoring, 128,610 confirmed takedowns/dead). Site: https://phishdestroy.io