# PhishDestroy threat dossier — animallaw.org
================================================================

Fetched:   2026-07-21 07:49:13 UTC
Canonical: https://phishdestroy.io/domain/animallaw.org/

## VERDICT
----------------------------------------------------------------
ACTIVE THREAT — multiple warning signs
Composite threat score: 47/100 (PhishDestroy scoring — see methodology below)

## DETECTION EVIDENCE
----------------------------------------------------------------
VirusTotal:      2/91 security vendors flagged this domain
  Flagging vendors: Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, SOCRadar
Public blocklists: listed on 1 independent blocklist

## INFRASTRUCTURE
----------------------------------------------------------------
Registrar:       Spaceship, Inc.
Nameservers:     ["ns3.afternic.com", "ns4.afternic.com"]
HTTP response:   200

## ABUSE-REPORT HISTORY (evidence of registrar non-response)
----------------------------------------------------------------
Status: pending notification queue. No abuse reports filed yet — this domain is
waiting for the next cycle of our automated abuse-reporter.

## TIMELINE
----------------------------------------------------------------
First detected:    2026-07-19 12:59:53 UTC (by PhishDestroy tracker)
Last verified:     2026-07-21 08:20:23 UTC
Current status:    ACTIVE / observable

## ANALYST NARRATIVE
----------------------------------------------------------------
[Generated: 2026-07-19 22:44:44 UTC — narrative may predate facts above. Treat fields in TIMELINE / DETECTION EVIDENCE / INFRASTRUCTURE as authoritative if they differ from the prose below.]

animallaw.org Phishing Alert — Credential Harvesting

Analysis indicates that animallaw.org is presently active and returns HTTP 200 responses, confirming a functional web server. VirusTotal records show that two of ninety‑one AV engines have flagged the domain, suggesting the presence of malicious components, though the majority of scanners have not reported detections. The domain is listed on a single security blocklist and has been explicitly blocked by the PhishDestroy filtering service, reflecting that at least one trusted anti‑phishing provider considers it a threat. The only concrete threat attribution available is a generic phishing classification, with no further details on the targeted brand, page content, or payload type. Consequently, the exact nature of the phishing campaign—such as credential‑harvesting forms or malicious redirects—remains unknown. Defenders should treat animallaw.org as hostile: add the domain to network‑level URL filtering and DNS blocklists, ensure endpoint security products receive the latest signatures, and monitor outbound connections for anomalous traffic to the host. Ongoing observation and periodic re‑scanning are advised to capture any evolution in the site’s behavior.

## EVIDENCE HASHES
----------------------------------------------------------------
Favicon MD5:       0f51e723b5ea18cf223bd66aaf0bda85

## SCORING METHODOLOGY
----------------------------------------------------------------
Composite score is NOT derived from VirusTotal alone. PhishDestroy aggregates:
  - VirusTotal positive ratio
  - Public blocklist consensus (MetaMask, ScamSniffer, OpenPhish, PhishTank, URLhaus,
    CryptoFirewall, SEAL, Polkadot, Enkrypt, Phishunt, DiscordPhishing, PhishingDB)
  - Cloaking detection (HTTP 666 or rendering delta between bot and real visitor)
  - DNS-filter consensus (Quad9, CleanBrowsing, NextDNS, AdGuard, Cloudflare, etc.)
  - AlienVault OTX pulses + Cloudflare Radar + Google Safe Browsing
  - URLScan / URLQuery verdicts
  - Brand-impersonation heuristics (DOM analysis of forms, logos, wording)
  - Known phishing-kit fingerprinting (favicon hash, JS obfuscation signatures)
  - Wallet-drainer family classification (Angel, MS, Rainbow, Pink, Inferno, ...)
  - Free-TLS vs paid-cert ratio (throwaway infrastructure signal)
  - Registrar/hosting abuse history (this registrar's track record)
  - Human researcher sign-off (operator takedown team)

A domain present in our database is ALREADY flagged. A low VT count by itself does
NOT mean the domain is safe — new scam domains routinely show 0/95 VT for their
first 7–30 days while actively draining wallets. Always cross-reference the composite
score and the individual indicators above, not just VT.

## CORRECTIONS / APPEALS
----------------------------------------------------------------
Full HTML report:  https://phishdestroy.io/domain/animallaw.org/
JSON API:          https://api.destroy.tools/v1/check?domain=animallaw.org
Appeal a flag:     https://phishdestroy.io/appeals/  (responded to within 48 hours, FP rate <0.01%)
Submit a report:   https://t.me/PhishDestroy_bot

About PhishDestroy: independent open-source threat-intelligence platform.
Tracked: 187,496 domains (57,601 alive under monitoring, 128,244 confirmed takedowns/dead). Site: https://phishdestroy.io