# PhishDestroy threat dossier — access.torzon-onion-market.com
================================================================

Fetched:   2026-07-22 03:36:24 UTC
Canonical: https://phishdestroy.io/domain/access.torzon-onion-market.com/

## VERDICT
----------------------------------------------------------------
ACTIVE THREAT — multiple warning signs
Composite threat score: 55/100 (PhishDestroy scoring — see methodology below)

## DETECTION EVIDENCE
----------------------------------------------------------------
VirusTotal:      9/91 security vendors flagged this domain
  Flagging vendors: alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, ESET, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, G-Data, SOCRadar, Sophos, VIPRE
Public blocklists: listed on 1 independent blocklist

## INFRASTRUCTURE
----------------------------------------------------------------
Registrar:       Dynadot Inc
Nameservers:     ["ns1.dyna-ns.net", "ns2.dyna-ns.net"]
HTTP response:   200

## ABUSE-REPORT HISTORY (evidence of registrar non-response)
----------------------------------------------------------------
Status: pending notification queue. No abuse reports filed yet — this domain is
waiting for the next cycle of our automated abuse-reporter.

## TIMELINE
----------------------------------------------------------------
First detected:    2026-07-19 13:00:17 UTC (by PhishDestroy tracker)
Last verified:     2026-07-22 04:20:20 UTC
Current status:    ACTIVE / observable

## ANALYST NARRATIVE
----------------------------------------------------------------
[Generated: 2026-07-19 20:59:57 UTC — narrative may predate facts above. Treat fields in TIMELINE / DETECTION EVIDENCE / INFRASTRUCTURE as authoritative if they differ from the prose below.]

access.torzon-onion-market.com used for generic phishing

access.torzon-onion-market.com is currently resolving to a live web server that returns HTTP 200 responses. The site has been identified as a generic phishing host and is listed as active in the latest intelligence feed. Defensive feeds indicate that PhishDestroy has already blocked the domain, yet it remains reachable, suggesting that the blocklist entry has not been propagated to all network controls. VirusTotal analysis shows that 9 of 91 scanned security vendors flagged the domain, providing modest but notable malicious confidence, and the domain appears on a single external blocklist. No additional infrastructure details such as hosting ASN, registrar, or hosting country are available in the current dataset, and the specific payload or credential‑ harvesting mechanisms have not been publicly disclosed. Consequently, the primary uncertainty concerns the extent of victim exposure and whether the phishing page is currently serving active credential‑collection forms. Defenders should ensure that the domain is added to local blocklists, enforce outbound DNS filtering for the exact hostname, and monitor network traffic for HTTP 200 responses to the domain. Continuous re‑scanning with VirusTotal or similar multi‑engine services is advised to capture any changes in vendor detections. Organizations should also review authentication logs for signs of credential submissions to the domain and enforce multi‑factor authentication to mitigate potential compromise.

## EVIDENCE HASHES
----------------------------------------------------------------
Favicon MD5:       9dc4d8cd865959b09f28dddfaae23d5f

## SCORING METHODOLOGY
----------------------------------------------------------------
Composite score is NOT derived from VirusTotal alone. PhishDestroy aggregates:
  - VirusTotal positive ratio
  - Public blocklist consensus (MetaMask, ScamSniffer, OpenPhish, PhishTank, URLhaus,
    CryptoFirewall, SEAL, Polkadot, Enkrypt, Phishunt, DiscordPhishing, PhishingDB)
  - Cloaking detection (HTTP 666 or rendering delta between bot and real visitor)
  - DNS-filter consensus (Quad9, CleanBrowsing, NextDNS, AdGuard, Cloudflare, etc.)
  - AlienVault OTX pulses + Cloudflare Radar + Google Safe Browsing
  - URLScan / URLQuery verdicts
  - Brand-impersonation heuristics (DOM analysis of forms, logos, wording)
  - Known phishing-kit fingerprinting (favicon hash, JS obfuscation signatures)
  - Wallet-drainer family classification (Angel, MS, Rainbow, Pink, Inferno, ...)
  - Free-TLS vs paid-cert ratio (throwaway infrastructure signal)
  - Registrar/hosting abuse history (this registrar's track record)
  - Human researcher sign-off (operator takedown team)

A domain present in our database is ALREADY flagged. A low VT count by itself does
NOT mean the domain is safe — new scam domains routinely show 0/95 VT for their
first 7–30 days while actively draining wallets. Always cross-reference the composite
score and the individual indicators above, not just VT.

## CORRECTIONS / APPEALS
----------------------------------------------------------------
Full HTML report:  https://phishdestroy.io/domain/access.torzon-onion-market.com/
JSON API:          https://api.destroy.tools/v1/check?domain=access.torzon-onion-market.com
Appeal a flag:     https://phishdestroy.io/appeals/  (responded to within 48 hours, FP rate <0.01%)
Submit a report:   https://t.me/PhishDestroy_bot

About PhishDestroy: independent open-source threat-intelligence platform.
Tracked: 187,720 domains (57,297 alive under monitoring, 128,779 confirmed takedowns/dead). Site: https://phishdestroy.io