# PhishDestroy threat dossier — 112js.cc
================================================================

Fetched:   2026-07-29 09:05:20 UTC
Canonical: https://phishdestroy.io/domain/112js.cc/

## VERDICT
----------------------------------------------------------------
CRITICAL THREAT — DO NOT VISIT
Composite threat score: 83/100 (PhishDestroy scoring — see methodology below)

## DETECTION EVIDENCE
----------------------------------------------------------------
VirusTotal:      2/91 security vendors flagged this domain
  Flagging vendors: Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, SOCRadar
Public blocklists: listed on 1 independent blocklist

## INFRASTRUCTURE
----------------------------------------------------------------
Registrar:       Dominet (HK) Limited
Nameservers:     ["ns1.domainnamedns.com", "ns2.domainnamedns.com"]
HTTP response:   200

## ABUSE-REPORT HISTORY (evidence of registrar non-response)
----------------------------------------------------------------
Status: pending notification queue. No abuse reports filed yet — this domain is
waiting for the next cycle of our automated abuse-reporter.

## TIMELINE
----------------------------------------------------------------
First detected:    2026-07-19 13:00:15 UTC (by PhishDestroy tracker)
Last verified:     2026-07-29 07:51:10 UTC
Current status:    ACTIVE / observable

## ANALYST NARRATIVE
----------------------------------------------------------------
[Generated: 2026-07-19 21:11:07 UTC — narrative may predate facts above. Treat fields in TIMELINE / DETECTION EVIDENCE / INFRASTRUCTURE as authoritative if they differ from the prose below.]

112js.cc Safety Check — Phishing Site Detected

112js.cc is currently flagged as a high‑risk phishing‑related domain. The domain returns HTTP 200, indicating an active web server that delivers content. VirusTotal records show that two of ninety‑one scanning engines have classified the host as malicious, providing limited but corroborating evidence of abuse. The domain is listed on a single security blocklist, where it is identified by PhishDestroy as a phishing source. No additional infrastructure details such as hosting provider, IP address, or ASN are available in the supplied intelligence. Consequently, the full scope of the campaign—targeted brands, credential‑harvesting techniques, or associated command‑and‑control infrastructure—remains unknown. Defenders should block outbound connections to 112js.cc at the network perimeter and add the domain to endpoint allow‑list exclusions. Monitoring of DNS queries for the domain and its resolved IP addresses is recommended to detect any future resolution attempts. Organizations should also educate users about unsolicited messages that may reference this domain, advising them to avoid clicking any links or providing credentials. Ongoing threat‑intel feeds should be consulted for updates, as additional detections or contextual indicators may emerge.

## EVIDENCE HASHES
----------------------------------------------------------------
Favicon MD5:       1bf288cae90246d716cb4eaa9553ef9c

## SCORING METHODOLOGY
----------------------------------------------------------------
Composite score is NOT derived from VirusTotal alone. PhishDestroy aggregates:
  - VirusTotal positive ratio
  - Public blocklist consensus (MetaMask, ScamSniffer, OpenPhish, PhishTank, URLhaus,
    CryptoFirewall, SEAL, Polkadot, Enkrypt, Phishunt, DiscordPhishing, PhishingDB)
  - Cloaking detection (HTTP 666 or rendering delta between bot and real visitor)
  - DNS-filter consensus (Quad9, CleanBrowsing, NextDNS, AdGuard, Cloudflare, etc.)
  - AlienVault OTX pulses + Cloudflare Radar + Google Safe Browsing
  - URLScan / URLQuery verdicts
  - Brand-impersonation heuristics (DOM analysis of forms, logos, wording)
  - Known phishing-kit fingerprinting (favicon hash, JS obfuscation signatures)
  - Wallet-drainer family classification (Angel, MS, Rainbow, Pink, Inferno, ...)
  - Free-TLS vs paid-cert ratio (throwaway infrastructure signal)
  - Registrar/hosting abuse history (this registrar's track record)
  - Human researcher sign-off (operator takedown team)

A domain present in our database is ALREADY flagged. A low VT count by itself does
NOT mean the domain is safe — new scam domains routinely show 0/95 VT for their
first 7–30 days while actively draining wallets. Always cross-reference the composite
score and the individual indicators above, not just VT.

## CORRECTIONS / APPEALS
----------------------------------------------------------------
Full HTML report:  https://phishdestroy.io/domain/112js.cc/
JSON API:          https://api.destroy.tools/v1/check?domain=112js.cc
Appeal a flag:     https://phishdestroy.io/appeals/  (responded to within 48 hours, FP rate <0.01%)
Submit a report:   https://t.me/PhishDestroy_bot

About PhishDestroy: independent open-source threat-intelligence platform.
Tracked: 194,182 domains (83,156 alive under monitoring, 108,406 confirmed takedowns/dead). Site: https://phishdestroy.io